Search: capital gains

11 results for “capital gains”+ Section 10(34)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 14843 Section 14716 Section 148A15 Section 15110 Section 144B6 Section 151A5 Section 1545 Reassessment5 Reopening of Assessment5 Section 143(3)

TEJ SINGH,MATHURA vs. ITO 1(3)(4), MATHURA

In the result, the Appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 8/AGR/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Agra26 Sept 2023AY 2009-10

Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148

capital gains tax and, therefore, the Assessing Officer had Page 19 of 23 Tej Singh vs. ITO reasons to believe that the income had escaped assessment. In the instant case, admittedly, the notice was issued after four years but before six years. In our opinion, the reasons so recorded by the Assessing Officer was not sufficient to intiate proceedings under

SH. KULDEEP SRIVASTAVA,MATHURA vs. I.T.O., WARD-3(2), MATHURA

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 227/AGR/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Agra13 Feb 2025AY 2009-10

: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalassessment Year: 2009-10

TEJ SINGH,MATHURA vs. ITO 1(3)(4), MATHURA

SH. KULDEEP SRIVASTAVA,MATHURA vs. I.T.O., WARD-3(2), MATHURA

TEJ SINGH,MATHURA vs. ITO 1(3)(4), MATHURA

SH. KULDEEP SRIVASTAVA,MATHURA vs. I.T.O., WARD-3(2), MATHURA

SATISH PRAKASH AGARWAL,AGRA vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE 1(2)(1), AGRA, AGRA

BALDEV SINGH BHADORIYA,GWALIOR vs. ITO-3(2), GWALIOR

HARICHARAN RATHORE,ASHOK NAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,ASHOK NAGAR, ASHOK NAGAR

NARAYANI RATHORE,SHIVPURI vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT,INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, DELHI

ASHOK SAHU,JHANSI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(3)(1), JHANSI, JHANSI

BADARIPRASAD,GUNA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER GUNA, GUNA

SUNITA,SAHU vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT,INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, DELHI

GINNI FILAMENTS LTD.,GAUTAM BUDH NAGAR vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(1)(1), AGRA

SURBHI ANAND,SOUTH DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AGRA