BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “capital gains”+ Revision u/s 263clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai279Delhi238Chennai139Jaipur85Bangalore80Indore73Kolkata61Chandigarh60Ahmedabad59Rajkot40Raipur34Surat34Panaji33Hyderabad32Visakhapatnam24Pune21Nagpur17Lucknow15Cuttack11Dehradun9Agra7Patna7Cochin7Amritsar7Jodhpur6Ranchi4Jabalpur3Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 26321Section 87A10Section 143(3)5Revision u/s 2635Section 143(1)3Section 111A3Section 54B3Section 139(1)2Section 2502Long Term Capital Gains

PRAMOD KUMAR DUBEY,GWALIOR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,1(3), GWALIOR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 314/AGR/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Agra03 Sept 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: BEFORE, SHRI M. BALAGANESH (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Manuj Sharma, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 111ASection 112ASection 112A(6)Section 115BSection 139(1)Section 139(5)Section 143(1)Section 250Section 87A

263 4. The assessee opted for new regime of taxation. As the total income of the assessee for the year under consideration did not exceed Rs. 7 lakhs, the assessee was eligible for tax rebate under Section 87A of the Act. The tax rebate under Section 87A of the Act is allowable on total income earned by the assessee except

2
Cash Deposit2
Demonetization2

SMT. SARIKA SRIVASTAVA,AGRA vs. PCIT-1, AGRA, AGRA

The appeals of the assessees are allowed in above terms

ITA 56/AGR/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Agra30 Apr 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: : Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2012-13

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263

revised u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by passing an order, including an order enhancing or modifying the assessment, or cancelling the assessment and directing a fresh assessment. V. You are hereby being granted final opportunity to furnish your explanation on each of the above mentioned issue(s) and issues mentioned in the Notice dated 27.10.2021, which

SHRI ATUL SRIVASTAVA,AGRA vs. PCIT-1, AGRA, AGRA

The appeals of the assessees are allowed in above terms

ITA 57/AGR/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Agra30 Apr 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: : Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2012-13

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263

revised u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by passing an order, including an order enhancing or modifying the assessment, or cancelling the assessment and directing a fresh assessment. V. You are hereby being granted final opportunity to furnish your explanation on each of the above mentioned issue(s) and issues mentioned in the Notice dated 27.10.2021, which

MARSHAL SECURITY SERVICES,AGRA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AGRA

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 131/AGR/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Agra28 Oct 2025AY 2016-17
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 250

gain. Also verification of properties sale transaction was\nalso the issue. Still this bench did not allow crossing the limit without obtaining\nprior permission.\nd) Sukhdham Infrastructure LLP v. Income Tax Officer (2024) 165\nTaxmann.com 154 (Kolkata Trib.)\nIssue:-There were four issues to verify (i) Interest Expenses (ii) Income from\nreal Estate Business (iii) Sales Turnover Mismatch

PRAMOD KUMAR GOYAL,GWALIOR vs. PR. CIT , GWALIOR

The appeal stand allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 368/AGR/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Agra22 Apr 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Satbeer Singh Godara, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No. 368/Agr/2018 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2013-14) Pramod Kumar Goyal Pr. Cit बनाम/ (Prop. M/S. Shreyansh Traders) Gwalior Chhutmal Ki Bajariya, Maina Wali Gali, Vs. Dal Bazar, Gwalior(Mp). "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Agspg-1575-G (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Sh. Navin Gargh, Adv. – Ld. Ar " थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Sh. Sukesh Kumar Jain – Ld. Cit-Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 20-02-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 22.04.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal () 1. By Way Of This Appeal, The Assessee Assails Invocation Of Revisionary Jurisdiction U/S 263 By Ld. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Gwalior (Pr.Cit) For Assessment Year (Ay) 2012-13 Vide Impugned Order Dated 23-03-2018 In The Matter Of An Assessment Framed By Ld. Ao U/S 143(3) Of The Act On 23-03-2016. Having Heard Rival Submissions & Upon Perusal Of Case Records, Our Adjudication Would Be As Under. 2. Upon Perusal Of Assessment Order, It Could Be Seen That The Assessee’S Return Of Income Was Scrutinized & During The Course Of Assessment Proceedings, Notices U/S 142(1) Were Issued Raising Various Queries Against The Assessee. The Assessee Claimed Exemption U/S 54B. Upon Perusal Of Computations & Various

For Appellant: Sh. Navin Gargh, Adv. – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Sh. Sukesh Kumar Jain – Ld. CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 50CSection 54B

263 by Ld. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Gwalior (Pr.CIT) for Assessment Year (AY) 2012-13 vide impugned order dated 23-03-2018 in the matter of an assessment framed by Ld. AO u/s 143(3) of the Act on 23-03-2016. Having heard rival submissions and upon perusal of case records, our adjudication would be as under

SHRI GOPAL SAXENA,FARRUKHABAD vs. PCIT-1 , AGRA, AGRA

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 43/AGR/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Agra12 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalita No. 43 /Agr/2022 (Assessment Year 2017-18)

For Appellant: Sh. Sahib P. Satsangi, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Sukesh Kumar Jain, CIT, DR
Section 263

u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”), respectively. 2. Heard both the parties at length. Case files perused. 3. We first advert to latter assessee Smt. Kumkum Saxena’s case ITA No. 44/Agra/2022 wherein the sole issue which arises for our apt adjudication is that of conversion of “limited” scrutiny assessment to a complete

KUMKUM SAXSENA,FARRUKHABAD vs. PCIT-1, AGRA, AGRA

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 44/AGR/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Agra12 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalita No. 43 /Agr/2022 (Assessment Year 2017-18)

For Appellant: Sh. Sahib P. Satsangi, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Sukesh Kumar Jain, CIT, DR
Section 263

u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”), respectively. 2. Heard both the parties at length. Case files perused. 3. We first advert to latter assessee Smt. Kumkum Saxena’s case ITA No. 44/Agra/2022 wherein the sole issue which arises for our apt adjudication is that of conversion of “limited” scrutiny assessment to a complete