BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 73clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,275Delhi766Jaipur241Chennai193Kolkata191Ahmedabad182Surat145Bangalore124Karnataka102Chandigarh87Hyderabad82Indore76Cochin59Pune52Rajkot42Amritsar38Calcutta36Raipur33Nagpur32Visakhapatnam28Lucknow27Guwahati25Cuttack21Jodhpur19Allahabad5Agra3Jabalpur3Dehradun3Telangana3Panaji2Ranchi1Patna1Varanasi1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 405Addition to Income3Section 143(3)2Section 145(3)2Disallowance2

AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,AGRA vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-1, AGRA

The appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 216/AGR/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Agra17 May 2021AY 2011-12
Section 124Section 142Section 153

bogus liability was created by the assessee and refund of allotment money of Rs.2,37,29,097/- was made in cash on a single day through unsigned voucher. ITA No.216/Agr/2016, 183/Agr/2014,439/Agr/2015 & ITA No. 177/Agr/2014 18 (vi) That, the Ld.CIT(A) has erred in law & on facts by deleting the addition of Rs.57,68,605/-, on account of under section

DCIT CIRCLE 1(1), GWALIOR vs. SWASTIK ROADLINES P LTD, GWALIOR

In the result, the appeal of Revenue is treated as partly allowed for

ITA 146/AGR/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Agra
08 Jan 2020
AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 201(1)Section 40

73 taxmann.com 63] (SC) (supra). Accordingly, Ground Nos.1 & 2 raised by Revenue are dismissed. I.T.A No. 146/Agra/2019 6 Ground No.3: 5. With respect to Ground No.3, Ld.DR had submitted that the Ld.CIT(A) had upheld the rejection of books of account. For that purposes he has drawn our attention to the findings recorded by the Ld.CIT(A) at Pgs.19-20

ITO 1(1)(1)(5), AGRA vs. SHANTI CONSTRUCTIONS , AGRA

In the result, the appeal filed by revenue is dismissed

ITA 289/AGR/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Agra16 May 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Dr. Mitha Lal Meenaincome Tax Officer, Ward,1(1)(5), Vs.. M/S Shanti Constructions, Ug-13, Aayakar Bhawan, Agra Shanti Madhuvan Plaza, Delhi Gate, Agra (Appellant) (Pan: Aaufs3185N) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. Pradeep K. Sahgal, Adv. & Sh. Utsav Sahgal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Bajpai CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 145(3)

bogus advances from customers the ld.CIT(A) deleted such addition by holding that the advances from customers shown by the 4 appellant as on 31.03.2012 were all old balances and no part of it was received during the impugned year and thus, he did not find any reason to support the action of the AO to add this amount