BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 80G(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai116Delhi97Bangalore51Ahmedabad44Chennai28Chandigarh28Kolkata24Pune17Jaipur16Hyderabad11Indore9Rajkot8Lucknow8Surat4Agra3Amritsar3Raipur3Ranchi3Allahabad2SC2Jodhpur2Cuttack1Visakhapatnam1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 271C3Deduction3Section 44A2Section 273B2Section 12A2Section 12A(1)(ac)2

STATE BANK OF INDIA,VRINDAVAN vs. CIT APPEALS 1, AGRA

In the result, ITA No. 65/Agra/2017 is allowed, whereas ITA

ITA 65/AGR/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Agra25 Jan 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain

Section 271CSection 273B

5 followed by two letters/notices dated 29.08.2014 and 03.03.2015. The only compliance made by the appellant to the three notices/letters was in the form of a letter dated 16.09.2014 duly signed by the Chief Manager, SBI, Mathura received by the A.O. apparently by post. The A.O., after considering the appellant's submission given in the aforementioned letter dated 16.09.2014, completed

GIRDHARI LAL KEDAR NATH SINGHAL,AGRA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(1)(1), AGRA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 182/AGR/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Agra03 Sept 2025
AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri S.Rifaur Rahmangirdhari Lal Kedar Nath Singhal, Vs. Ito 1 (1)(1), Ff – 1, Bhagwati Complex, Agra. M.G. Road, Opp. Shah Cinema, Agra – 282 002 (Uttar Pradesh). (Pan : Aacfg5458N) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Naveen Garg, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 21.08.2025 Date Of Order : 03.09.2025

For Appellant: Shri Naveen Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 131Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 44ASection 80G

80G to the extent of Rs.19,786/- and disallowance of indirect expenditure of Rs.50,000/-. 3. Aggrieved assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. Addl./JCIT (A)-1, Chandigarh and raised grounds, filed detailed submissions before the ld. JCIT. After considering the submissions of the assessee, ld. JCIT sustained the additions made by the AO with regard to contract payment

OMKAR MEMORIAL CHARITABLE SOCIETY ,GWALIOR vs. CIT[EXEMPTION], BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 160/AGR/2024[00]Status: DisposedITAT Agra27 Feb 2025

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Virtual Hearing) Omkar Memorial Vs. Cit(E), Charitable Society, Bhopal Room No. 201, Ii Floor, Reac, Bhopal (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaaa08054B Assessee By : Shri K. Sampath, Adv Revenue By: Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 05/02/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 27/02/2025

For Appellant: Shri K. Sampath, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain, CIT DR
Section 11(2)Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

5. With regard to professional payments made by the assessee during the FY 2021-22, the assessee had given the details of the addresses to whom the payments were made and which were duly subjected to deduction of tax at source together with the concerned ledger account. The ld CIT(E) had disregarded this ledger account and observed that