BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “TDS”+ Section 226(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi350Mumbai294Chennai188Karnataka168Bangalore132Kolkata94Raipur88Ahmedabad60Jaipur59Pune56Hyderabad52Dehradun31Indore30Chandigarh28Jodhpur23Cuttack16Cochin14Rajkot14Lucknow13Visakhapatnam10Amritsar9Nagpur8Surat6Jabalpur6Guwahati6Panaji5Patna4Kerala3SC3Agra2Telangana2Allahabad2Ranchi1Orissa1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 271C10Section 12A8Section 273B4Section 133A2Section 197A2Deduction2Penalty2TDS2Survey u/s 133A2

ITO TDS-II, AGRA vs. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, AGRA

In the result, all the three appeals are allowed

ITA 203/AGR/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Agra07 Aug 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 12ASection 133ASection 197ASection 271CSection 273B

3 I.T.A No. 205/Agra/2018 A.Y. 2012-13 I.T.A No. 203/Agra/2018 A.Y. 2012-13 I.T.A No. 204/Agra/2018 A.Y. 2013-14 I.T.A No. 205/Agra/2018 A.Y. 2012-13 Development Authority, is closely identified with the state government, and its key decision-makers are government officials, which, in my opinion, was sufficient reason for the appellant bank to be under the bonafide belief that

ITO TDS-II, AGRA vs. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, AGRA

In the result, all the three appeals are allowed

ITA 204/AGR/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Agra07 Aug 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 12ASection 133ASection 197ASection 271CSection 273B

3 I.T.A No. 205/Agra/2018 A.Y. 2012-13 I.T.A No. 203/Agra/2018 A.Y. 2012-13 I.T.A No. 204/Agra/2018 A.Y. 2013-14 I.T.A No. 205/Agra/2018 A.Y. 2012-13 Development Authority, is closely identified with the state government, and its key decision-makers are government officials, which, in my opinion, was sufficient reason for the appellant bank to be under the bonafide belief that