BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “TDS”+ Section 194Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai634Delhi406Bangalore251Kolkata200Chennai165Ahmedabad56Karnataka56Hyderabad48Chandigarh37Cochin35Jaipur35Pune28Cuttack24Dehradun20Indore19Visakhapatnam16Rajkot15Jabalpur13Telangana11Amritsar11Nagpur11Raipur10Panaji10Surat8Patna8Agra5Calcutta4Lucknow4Jodhpur4Allahabad4SC3Varanasi2Guwahati1Orissa1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 2017Section 201(1)6Section 194C5Section 2634TDS4Section 194J3Section 403Deduction3Section 1912Section 271C

GRAM VIKAS KALYAN SANSTHAN,MATHURA vs. I.T.O. (TDS), AGRA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 30/AGR/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Agra28 Oct 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S.Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhgram Vikas Kalyan Sansthan, Vs. Income Tax Officer (Tds), Nagla Aklha, Sonkh – Goverdhan Road, Agra. Mathura – 281 123 (Uttar Pradesh). (Pan : Aaatg3272E) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Rajan Gupta, Ca Revenue By : Shri Shalenndra Shrivastava, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 13.10.2025 Date Of Order : 28.10.2025

For Appellant: Shri Rajan Gupta, CAFor Respondent: Shri Shalenndra Shrivastava, Sr. DR
Section 194CSection 201Section 201(1)

section 201/201(1A) of the Act. In case, the payee declares the abovesaid income in their return of income and pays the due tax, the liability of the assessee is discharged and before making the disallowance, the Assessing Officer has to determine whether the assessee is in default or not u/s 201/201(1A). In 7 case, it is found that

2
Disallowance2
Addition to Income2

M/S R.K. BAJPAI,AURAIYA vs. CIT -1, AGRA

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

ITA 154/AGR/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Agra16 May 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Dr. Mitha Lal Meenam/S R.K. Bajpai, Vs..Dcit,Circle-1, Dibiyapur, Auraiya. Agra. Panno.Aaffr8521G (Assessee) (Revenue)

Section 194CSection 263Section 40Section 40a

194J, therefore, a show cause given to assessee that why may not be Rs.5,26,400/- is added in your income. In response to this assessee submitted as under :- "A sum of Rs.4,92,250/- has been debited towards rent of equipment and Rs.34,150/- as legal expense and no TDS has been made as per the provisions of Section

DISTRICT BASIC EDUCATION OFFICER,HATHRAS vs. ITO TDS ALIGARH, ALIGARH

Appeal is allowed

ITA 321/AGR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Agra12 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalita No. 321/Agr./2024 (Assessment Year 2017-18)

For Appellant: Sh. Navin Kumar, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Shailender Shrivastava, Sr. DR
Section 194JSection 201(1)Section 271C

section 271C penalty herein alleging non- deduction of TDS by the assessee/deductor, i.e. Uttar Pradesh Education, on payments made to various persons for carrying out the designated project assignments. The assessee/deductor is admittedly a government body who engaged various persons to whom payments in question have been held as consultancy services liable for TDS deduction u/s 194J

MOON NETWORK PRIVATE LIMITED,AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS-1 AGRA, AGRA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated above

ITA 186/AGR/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Agra28 Oct 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: SHRIS.RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Rajendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Shailendra Srivastava, Sr.DR
Section 191Section 194CSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)

194J for the year under consideration (short deduction of TDS against payment made to various broad casting channels), accordingly the AO has passed the order, treated the assessee in default for short deduction as well as u/s 201(1)/201(1A) of the Act. He submitted that against the order dated 28.03.2014 passed u/s 201(1)/201(1A), the assessee

AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,AGRA vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-1, AGRA

The appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 216/AGR/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Agra17 May 2021AY 2011-12
Section 124Section 142Section 153

TDS having been deducted during the year, the expenditure is allowable u/s 40(a). The disallowance is wholly illegal. The same may kindly be directed to be deleted. (12) Pause Ld.CIT (Appeal) has erred in law and on facts in confirming the addition Rs 46, 78, 719/- in respect of non inclusion of other receipt under infrastructure fund. The Ld.CIT