BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “TDS”+ Section 150(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi448Mumbai371Bangalore355Patna300Chennai177Ahmedabad108Hyderabad103Kolkata101Karnataka87Jaipur84Cochin78Chandigarh73Pune42Indore40Visakhapatnam39Raipur36Lucknow26Nagpur26Rajkot25Cuttack24Dehradun23Guwahati17Surat9Amritsar7Allahabad6Jabalpur3SC2Jodhpur2Agra2Ranchi1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 2634Section 403Section 194C3TDS2

M/S R.K. BAJPAI,AURAIYA vs. CIT -1, AGRA

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

ITA 154/AGR/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Agra16 May 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Dr. Mitha Lal Meenam/S R.K. Bajpai, Vs..Dcit,Circle-1, Dibiyapur, Auraiya. Agra. Panno.Aaffr8521G (Assessee) (Revenue)

Section 194CSection 263Section 40Section 40a

1-12). 5. On the first issue, the Tribunal has held (page 10, para 6 of the order) as follows: “We hold that the impugned payments of Rs. 86,65,626/- on account of labour and transportation was not made to contractors and therefore provision of section 194C of the Act were not violated by the assessee. There was therefore

ATMA RAM AUTO ENTERPRISES,AGRA vs. ACIT(TDS),, AGRA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 6/AGR/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Agra26 Sept 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: : Shri A.D. Jain & Shri Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 194CSection 194HSection 271

section 133A(1) on 22.11.2012, it was noticed that the assessee has debited payments made to various persons / entities under the head commission. It was explained that the assessee was under a bona-fide belief that there ITA 06 & 07/Agra/2016 5 was no obligation to deduct tax to such persons as these payment were in the form of contractual payments