BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “TDS”+ Carry Forward of Lossesclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,935Delhi879Kolkata547Chennai330Bangalore297Ahmedabad196Chandigarh167Hyderabad135Pune129Raipur111Jaipur97Rajkot73Cochin65Surat64Visakhapatnam61Cuttack53Indore51Nagpur50Amritsar39Lucknow38Ranchi36Guwahati23Patna17Varanasi11Panaji10Allahabad8Karnataka7Jabalpur6SC5Jodhpur4Dehradun3Agra2Kerala1Telangana1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 1442Disallowance2Addition to Income2Limitation/Time-bar2

MARSHAL SECURITY SERVICES,AGRA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AGRA

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 131/AGR/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Agra28 Oct 2025AY 2016-17
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 250

TDS, then that will in a\nway give arbitrary powers to the Assessing Officers to do complete scrutiny\nand thus circumvent the provision of ACT, which require mandatory approval of\ncompetent authority to convert limited scrutiny to complete scrutiny.\nConclusion:- under limited scrutiny Assessing Officer has very little scope and\nhe must abide by the provision

AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,AGRA vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-1, AGRA

The appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 216/AGR/2016[2011-12]Status: Disposed
ITAT Agra
17 May 2021
AY 2011-12
Section 124Section 142Section 153

carry out those functions which would otherwise be carried out by the State Govt. Appellant finds support in the Ruling of Honourable Supreme Court . (6.1) That functions and duties of a Development Authority was defined by the honorable Supreme Court in Union of India Vs. R.C.Jain AIR 1981 SC 951 wherein it was held: “ They must be entrusted by statute