BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “section 68”+ Section 5clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi10,786Mumbai9,571Kolkata3,198Bangalore2,576Chennai2,183Ahmedabad1,594Jaipur1,103Hyderabad1,019Pune844Karnataka806Surat791Indore644Chandigarh597Cochin416Rajkot415Raipur379Lucknow286Nagpur268Visakhapatnam256Amritsar201Guwahati192Agra188Telangana161Patna153Calcutta135SC127Jodhpur119Ranchi117Cuttack114Panaji104Dehradun91Allahabad82Jabalpur51Varanasi50Rajasthan22Orissa13Kerala13Punjab & Haryana6A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN5Uttarakhand4Gauhati3Andhra Pradesh2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI2K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1Himachal Pradesh1Tripura1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1HARJIT SINGH BEDI CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)4Section 1322

P.R. METRANI vs. COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE

Appeals are allowed

C.A. No.-005673-005675 - 2002Supreme Court15 Nov 2006
For Respondent: Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore
Section 132Section 132(5)Section 139(2)Section 143(2)Section 69C

5) of Section 132 and the presumption cannot be said to have the effect of excluding the application of Section 68

M/S.VIRTUAL SOFT SYSTEMS LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-I

C.A. No.-007115-007115 - 2005Supreme Court
06 Feb 2007
For Respondent: Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-I
Section 260ASection 271(1)(c)Section 68

68,94,982.00 was the income in respect of which inaccurate particulars had been furnished. The tax was computed at Rs. 31,71,692.00. It was held that the tax sought to be evaded was Rs. 31,71,692.00 and imposed penalty of Rs. 31,71,692.00 (100% of the tax). The Commissioner of Income Tax confirmed the order