BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “section 68”+ Natural Justiceclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi3,828Mumbai2,936Bangalore1,024Ahmedabad880Chennai792Kolkata776Jaipur746Karnataka705Hyderabad475Pune359Indore311Chandigarh301Surat283Rajkot203Raipur198Cochin152Lucknow148Agra144Visakhapatnam140Nagpur138Amritsar135Cuttack122Telangana115Calcutta107Guwahati103Patna79Allahabad76Jodhpur75Panaji52SC45Ranchi40Dehradun35Varanasi29Jabalpur22Rajasthan13Orissa12Kerala7Gauhati3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1Uttarakhand1Andhra Pradesh1Punjab & Haryana1Himachal Pradesh1

M/S. SERVO-MED INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI

The appeal is allowed and the impugned judgment is hereby set aside

C.A. No.-000583-000583 - 2005Supreme Court07 May 2015
Section 2

nature and extent of processing may vary from one case to another, and indeed there may be several stages of processing and perhaps a different kind of processing at each stage. With each process suffered, the original commodity experiences a change. But it is only when the change, or a series of changes, take the commodity to the point where

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE HYDERABAD vs. M/S SARVOTHAM CARE LIMITED

C.A. No.-004480-004480 - 2005Supreme Court14 May 2015
Section 11ASection 4A

nature of the product falls for determination. In fact, notwithstanding the fact that the appellants have described the product as Selsun Shampoo, the Central Board of Excise and Customs, as noticed earlier, has classified the same as patent and proprietary medicine. The respondents have accepted the same. Therefore, there is no force in the submission of the learned counsel