BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 9clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi5,620Mumbai4,831Chennai1,567Bangalore1,367Kolkata1,129Ahmedabad902Jaipur769Hyderabad699Raipur481Pune461Chandigarh404Surat380Indore327Amritsar283Rajkot272Cochin246Visakhapatnam212Cuttack183Karnataka182Patna156Nagpur148Agra120Lucknow118Guwahati106Dehradun101Ranchi87Telangana86Jodhpur69Allahabad60SC45Panaji37Calcutta21Jabalpur17Varanasi13Orissa12Rajasthan10Kerala9Punjab & Haryana4A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Gauhati3Himachal Pradesh2J&K1Uttarakhand1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1

Key Topics

Section 112Penalty2

M/S.JASWAL NECO LTD. vs. COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS, VISAKHAPATNAM

C.A. No.-007189-007189 - 2005Supreme Court04 Aug 2015
Section 12Section 18Section 3ASection 68Section 9A

Section 9(2) authorises the sales tax authorities of a State to assess, reassess, collect and enforce payment of the Central

COMMNR.,CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS, KERALA vs. M/S. LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD

Appeals are disposed of

C.A. No.-006770-006770 - 2004Supreme Court20 Aug 2015

Section 9. Levy and collection of tax and penalties. — (2) Subject to the other provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder, the authorities for the time being empowered to assess, reassess

SHABINA ABRAHAM vs. COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS

C.A. No.-005802-005802 - 2005Supreme Court29 Jul 2015
Section 11Section 11ASection 4(3)(a)

9. The position under the Income Tax Act, 1922 was also the same until Section 24B was introduced by the Income Tax 10 Page 11 JUDGMENT (Second Amendment) Act of 1933. Prior to the introduction of the aforesaid Section, the Bombay High Court had occasion to deal with a similar question in Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay v. Ellis