BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 6clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi3,177Mumbai2,993Chennai1,079Ahmedabad793Kolkata647Jaipur595Hyderabad571Bangalore559Raipur441Pune393Chandigarh370Indore264Rajkot247Surat222Amritsar187Cochin169Patna160Visakhapatnam156Nagpur128Agra120Cuttack117Guwahati104Ranchi94Dehradun83Lucknow82Jodhpur76SC74Allahabad47Panaji33Jabalpur15Varanasi9A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1

Key Topics

Section 112Penalty2

M/S.JASWAL NECO LTD. vs. COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS, VISAKHAPATNAM

C.A. No.-007189-007189 - 2005Supreme Court04 Aug 2015
Section 12Section 18Section 3ASection 68Section 9A

6 SCC 479, this Court held:- “11. Section 9(2-A) makes applicable to the assessment, re-assessment, collection and enforcement of Central sales tax the provisions relating to offences and penalties contained in the State Acts as if the Central sales tax was a State sales tax. But Section 9(2-A) makes no reference to interest. 12. There

SHABINA ABRAHAM vs. COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS

C.A. No.-005802-005802 - 2005Supreme Court29 Jul 2015
Section 11
Section 11A
Section 4(3)(a)

6) The liability of a legal representative under this section shall, subject to the provisions of sub-section (4) and sub-section (5), be limited to the extent to which the estate is capable of meeting the liability.” “168. (1) Subject as hereinafter provided, the income of the estate of a deceased person shall be chargeable

COMMNR.,CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS, KERALA vs. M/S. LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD

Appeals are disposed of

C.A. No.-006770-006770 - 2004Supreme Court20 Aug 2015

6) 23. To similar effect is this Court’s judgment in CIT v. B.C. Srinivasa Setty, (1981) 2 SCC 460, held:- “Section 45 charges the profits or gains arising from the transfer of a capital asset to income tax. The asset must be one which falls within the contemplation of the section. It must bear that quality which brings Section