BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 4clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi3,310Mumbai3,124Chennai1,098Ahmedabad800Kolkata679Jaipur616Hyderabad575Bangalore565Raipur441Pune402Chandigarh366Indore265Rajkot254Surat225Amritsar200Cochin181Patna167Visakhapatnam161Nagpur139Agra130Cuttack117Guwahati106Ranchi96Dehradun87Lucknow86SC80Jodhpur77Allahabad47Panaji33Jabalpur15Varanasi9A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1

Key Topics

Section 112Penalty2

SHABINA ABRAHAM vs. COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS

C.A. No.-005802-005802 - 2005Supreme Court29 Jul 2015
Section 11Section 11ASection 4(3)(a)

reassessment or recomputation under section 147) of the income of the deceased and for the purpose of levying any sum in the hands of the legal representative in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (1),— (a) any proceeding taken against the deceased before his death shall be deemed to have been taken against the legal representative

M/S.JASWAL NECO LTD. vs. COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS, VISAKHAPATNAM

C.A. No.-007189-007189 - 2005Supreme Court04 Aug 2015
Section 12Section 18Section 3A
Section 68
Section 9A

4 SCC 276 at paragraph 16), thereby making it clear that such levy can only be prospective. 25. Further, in India Carbon Ltd. v. State of Assam, (1997) 6 SCC 479, this Court held:- “11. Section 9(2-A) makes applicable to the assessment, re-assessment, collection and enforcement of Central sales tax the provisions relating to offences and penalties

COMMNR.,CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS, KERALA vs. M/S. LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD

Appeals are disposed of

C.A. No.-006770-006770 - 2004Supreme Court20 Aug 2015

4 of the gross value of the works contract. 29. It is interesting to note that while introducing the concept of service tax on indivisible works contracts various exclusions are also made such as works contracts in respect of roads, 39 Page 40 JUDGMENT airports, airways transport, bridges, tunnels, and dams. These infrastructure projects have been excluded and continue