BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 32(1)(ii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,669Mumbai1,299Chennai512Bangalore461Jaipur416Hyderabad301Ahmedabad281Kolkata249Chandigarh197Indore146Amritsar134Raipur128Pune124Rajkot98Surat96Visakhapatnam78Patna67Karnataka65Cochin59Cuttack58Guwahati54Nagpur54Telangana47Lucknow46Ranchi29Agra28Allahabad26SC21Jodhpur15Dehradun13Orissa6Calcutta6Rajasthan4A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Jabalpur3Kerala3Panaji3Himachal Pradesh2K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Uttarakhand1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 112Penalty2

M/S.JASWAL NECO LTD. vs. COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS, VISAKHAPATNAM

C.A. No.-007189-007189 - 2005Supreme Court04 Aug 2015
Section 12Section 18Section 3ASection 68Section 9A

reassess, collect and enforce payment of the Central sales tax payable by a dealer as if it was payable under the State Act; this is the first part of Section 9(2). By the second part thereof, these authorities are empowered to exercise the powers they have under the State Act and the provisions of the State Act, including provisions

SHABINA ABRAHAM vs. COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS

C.A. No.-005802-005802 - 2005Supreme Court29 Jul 2015
Section 11
Section 11A
Section 4(3)(a)

1) is thus equated with the original jurisdiction to assess the dealer under section 14 . By this method, the continuity of the legal personality of the assessee is maintained in order to enable the assessment of turnover which has escaped assessment. It is no answer to a notice under section 15 that the partners having dissolved the firm, the assessment

COMMNR.,CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS, KERALA vs. M/S. LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD

Appeals are disposed of

C.A. No.-006770-006770 - 2004Supreme Court20 Aug 2015

II. This is for the reason that in our Constitutional scheme, taxation powers of the Centre and the States are mutually exclusive. There is no concurrent power of taxation. This being the case, the moment the levy contained in a taxing statute transgresses into a prohibited exclusive field, it is liable to be struck down. In the present case