BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 27clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,577Mumbai2,194Bangalore846Chennai738Kolkata414Hyderabad409Jaipur393Ahmedabad378Chandigarh202Pune174Raipur136Rajkot104Indore102Surat95Amritsar89Patna72Lucknow59Visakhapatnam53Agra48Nagpur44Guwahati42Cochin41Allahabad37Dehradun27Cuttack26Ranchi26SC25Jodhpur18Karnataka18Panaji16Telangana16Orissa11Jabalpur9Calcutta7Rajasthan4A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Kerala3K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1J&K1Uttarakhand1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 112Penalty2

SHABINA ABRAHAM vs. COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS

C.A. No.-005802-005802 - 2005Supreme Court29 Jul 2015
Section 11Section 11ASection 4(3)(a)

27 Page 28 JUDGMENT It then went on to quote Section 15(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 and then arrived at this conclusion: “22. Section 15(1) contains an important clause that action thereunder can be taken by the Collector after giving a notice to the assessee under Section 14(3) of the Act within the prescribed

M/S.JASWAL NECO LTD. vs. COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS, VISAKHAPATNAM

C.A. No.-007189-007189 - 2005Supreme Court04 Aug 2015
Section 12Section 18Section 3A
Section 68
Section 9A

27-Oct-1998 Metallurgical coke (Metcoke) originating in, or exported from, China PR – Anti-dumping duty “Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 9A of the said Customs Tariff Act, read with rules 18 and 20 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles

COMMNR.,CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS, KERALA vs. M/S. LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD

Appeals are disposed of

C.A. No.-006770-006770 - 2004Supreme Court20 Aug 2015

27. In fact, the speech made by the Hon’ble Finance Minister in moving the Bill to tax Composite Indivisible Works Contracts specifically stated:- “State Governments levy a tax on the transfer of property in goods involved in the execution of a works contract. The value of services in a works contract should attract service tax. Hence, I propose