BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 2(30)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi3,043Mumbai2,895Chennai895Bangalore834Jaipur703Ahmedabad586Kolkata548Hyderabad525Pune317Chandigarh289Indore205Surat199Rajkot185Amritsar185Raipur178Visakhapatnam148Cuttack107Cochin98Agra96Nagpur92Patna88Lucknow85Karnataka78Guwahati63Telangana58Dehradun53Jodhpur50Allahabad47Ranchi41SC27Panaji16Orissa9Calcutta9Rajasthan8Jabalpur7Kerala5Varanasi5A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Himachal Pradesh2K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Uttarakhand1Gauhati1Madhya Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 112Penalty2

M/S.JASWAL NECO LTD. vs. COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS, VISAKHAPATNAM

C.A. No.-007189-007189 - 2005Supreme Court04 Aug 2015
Section 12Section 18Section 3ASection 68Section 9A

reassess, collect and enforce payment of the Central sales tax payable by a dealer as if it was payable under the State Act; this is the first part of Section 9(2). By the second part thereof, these authorities are empowered to exercise the powers they have under the State Act and the provisions of the State Act, including provisions

SHABINA ABRAHAM vs. COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS

C.A. No.-005802-005802 - 2005Supreme Court29 Jul 2015
Section 11
Section 11A
Section 4(3)(a)

30 Page 31 JUDGMENT Section 14. By this method, the Court found the continuity of the legal personality of the assessee is maintained in order to enable the assessment of turnover which has escaped assessment. The crucial difference, therefore, between Section 15(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 and Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt

COMMNR.,CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS, KERALA vs. M/S. LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD

Appeals are disposed of

C.A. No.-006770-006770 - 2004Supreme Court20 Aug 2015

30. It now remains to consider the judgment of the Delhi High Court in G.D. Builders. 31. In the aforesaid judgment, it was held that the levy of service tax in Section 65(105)(g), (zzd), (zzh), (zzq) and (zzzh) is good enough to tax indivisible composite works contracts. 40 Page 41 JUDGMENT Various judgments were referred to which have