Search: house property

2 results for “house property”+ Section 112clear

Sorted by relevance

M/S GMR ENERGY LTD. vs. COMMR.OF CUSTOMS,BANGALORE

C.A. No.-004920-004920 - 2007Supreme Court27 Oct 2015

112(a) and/94 Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962 should not be imposed.” 5. The reply to the show cause notice sent by the assessee disputed all the allegations made and stated in particular as follows:- “H. VALUE DECLARED FOR INSURANCE IS THE Page 7 JUDGMENT 7 BEST REFERENCE TO DETERMINE THE INTRINSIC VALUE OF THE GOODS IMPORTED

M/S. SERVO-MED INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI

The appeal is allowed and the impugned judgment is hereby set aside

C.A. No.-000583-000583 - 2005Supreme Court07 May 2015

Section 2

Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, there is no mention of the test of integral or inextricable process and found that the wrong test had been applied to arrive at the wrong result. 5. The CESTAT in turn set aside the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) observing: “An Article with distinct brand name and separate