BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “house property”+ Penaltyclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,216Delhi1,093Bangalore349Jaipur293Chennai249Karnataka228Ahmedabad204Hyderabad173Kolkata150Chandigarh150Pune108Indore52Raipur49Lucknow42Calcutta34Telangana33SC33Surat30Nagpur28Rajkot23Visakhapatnam19Agra18Patna16Cuttack15Amritsar11Cochin9Guwahati8Rajasthan7Jodhpur4Allahabad4Dehradun3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Panaji3Orissa2Varanasi2Ranchi2ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1Jabalpur1Himachal Pradesh1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 11A3Section 22Penalty2Exemption2

M/S GUJARAT INDUSTRIES vs. COMMR.OF CENTRAL EXCISE-I,AHMEDABAD

C.A. No.-005784-005788 - 2007Supreme Court14 Dec 2015
Section 11ASection 2

penalties imposed by the Commissioner. 5. It is in the aforesaid backdrop the questions of law formulated/raised by the appellants need to be decided. Civil Appeal Nos. 5784-5788 of 2007 & Ors. Page 4 of 18 Page 5 JUDGMENT 6. We first advert to the central and crucial issue, namely, whether the gauge reduction of the hot rolled SS patta/pattis

M/S GMR ENERGY LTD. vs. COMMR.OF CUSTOMS,BANGALORE

C.A. No.-004920-004920 - 2007Supreme Court27 Oct 2015

property of GE. Removed assemblies are to be in a repairable condition.” 15. From this document what becomes clear is that the prices stated in the invoices accompanying the bills of entry in the present case are list unit prices or catalogue prices. By no stretch of imagination can they said to be prices after re-exported items’ value

COMMR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BHAVNAGAR vs. M/S GUJARAT MARITIME BOARD,JAFRABAD

C.A. No.-003347-003348 - 2014Supreme Court22 Jul 2015
Section 37Section 65(82)

penalty, which was imposed on the assessee. 3. In appeal from this order, CESTAT by its judgment dated 1.8.2013 reversed the Commissioner’s order holding that no service at all was rendered by the Gujarat Maritime Board in relation to any vessel and, therefore, no amount was payable by way of service tax. Equally, on 3 Page 4 JUDGMENT