BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “disallowance”+ Section 6(1)(c)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai12,919Delhi9,998Bangalore3,856Chennai3,640Kolkata3,506Ahmedabad2,334Jaipur1,425Pune1,238Hyderabad1,120Indore676Surat657Chandigarh640Cochin527Raipur411Karnataka367Visakhapatnam364Amritsar361Rajkot360Cuttack259Lucknow254Nagpur250Panaji168Jodhpur164Agra133Guwahati127SC111Telangana101Allahabad89Calcutta83Ranchi71Dehradun70Kerala66Patna47Jabalpur46Varanasi42Punjab & Haryana18Rajasthan8Orissa7Himachal Pradesh6A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN5ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1RANJAN GOGOI PRAFULLA C. PANT1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Uttarakhand1Gauhati1Andhra Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1

Key Topics

Section 80H7Section 43B5Section 11A4Section 44Deduction3Limitation/Time-bar2

JEYAR CONSULTANT & INVESTMENT PVT. LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,MADRAS

C.A. No.-008912-008912 - 2003Supreme Court01 Apr 2015
Section 80H

6 of 24 Page 7 JUDGMENT permissible. According to him, while forming this opinion the High Court looked into sub-section (1) of Section 80HHC alone as is clear from the order of the High Court, and did not take into consideration provisions of sub-section (3) thereof. His submission was that no doubt, this Court in the case

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MYSORE vs. M/S. TVS MOTORS COMPANY LTD

C.A. No.-005155-005156 - 2007Supreme Court15 Dec 2015
Section 4Section 4(3)(d)

6 of the Valuation Rules on the same grounds as indicated in respect of Advertisement and Publicity charges. That is, in such cases the after sales service charges and PDI charges will be included in the assessable value. Civil Appeal Nos. 5155-5156 of 2007 & Ors. Page 17 of 27 Page 18 JUDGMENT 15. The aforesaid clarification, if that

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, KERALA vs. M/S. TRAVANCORE SUGARS & CHEMICALS LTD

The appeal stands disposed of in

C.A. No.-002558-002558 - 2005Supreme Court07 May 2015

Bench: The Expiry Of The Relevant Previous Year. On 30.04.1993, The Assessing Officer Completed The Assessment For The Year 1990-1991 & Inter Alia Confirmed Disallowance Of The Vend Fee. Against This, The Assessee Preferred An Appeal Before The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Who, By His Order Dated 24.05.1993, Deleted The Disallowance Under Section 43B & Allowed The Appeal Of The Respondent-Assessee. Aggrieved By The Said Order, The Revenue Preferred An C. A. No. 2558/ 2005 1

Section 256(1)Section 28Section 36Section 43B

disallowance under S. 43B of the I.T. Act in respect of the vend fee of Rs. 22,87,512/- outstanding as a liability payable to the Government of Kerala as on the last day of the accounting year?” Section 43B of the Income Tax Act allows certain deductions only to be on actual payment. Section 43B reads as follows

M/S. PUROLATOR INDIA LTD. vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI-III

Appeal is disposed of accordingly

C.A. No.-001959-001959 - 2006Supreme Court25 Aug 2015
Section 11ASection 11A(1)Section 38ASection 4

6 Page 7 JUDGMENT ''transaction value" means the price actually paid or payable for the goods, when sold, and includes in addition to amount charged as priced, any amount that they buyer is liable to pay to, or on behalf of, the assessee, by reason of, or in connection with the sale, whether payable at the time of sale

M/S. B.P.L. LTD. vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CALICUT

C.A. No.-005523-005523 - 2004Supreme Court05 May 2015
Section 11A

disallowing the benefit of the notification to the Defibrillator thereby concurring with the view of the Technical Member. 11) This is how the matter has come up to this court in the form of present appeal filed by the appellant under Section 35 L(b) of the Civil Appeal Nos. 5523 & 6037 of 2004 Page 7 of 19 Page