← All Phrases

“Section 4(3)(ia)”

Section References (mined)Section 4Section 4(3)(ia)3 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 4(3)(ia) is Indwell Constructions v. CIT (232 ITR 776), cited in 188 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 4(3)(ia)

Indwell Constructions v. CIT
232 ITR 776 · 1998 · High Court
188
citing judgments

When an assessee's income is estimated after rejecting their books of account, further additions or disallowances for specific expenses are generally not permissible, as the estimation already accounts for these.

CIT v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
324 ITR 199 · 2010 · High Court
69
citing judgments

A taxpayer is eligible for deduction under Section 80IA for developing and operating infrastructure facilities, with the decision clarifying the distinction between a contractor and a developer for this purpose.

Asstt. CIT v. Pratibha Industries Ltd.
141 ITD 151 · 2013 · ITAT
64
citing judgments

Where an assessee invests its own funds in an infrastructure development project, it is presumed to be acting as a developer, not merely a contractor, making it eligible for deduction under section 80-IA(4).

Sonic Biochem Extractions (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (
25 Taxmann.com 25 · 2012 · ITAT
63
citing judgments

Prior to the jurisdictional High Court's decision in CIT v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. on October 15, 2011, the purchase of off-the-shelf software was not subject to TDS, and therefore, no disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) or 40(a)(ia) could be made.

CIT v. Smt. Santosh Jain
296 ITR 324 · 2008 · High Court
54
citing judgments

When business income is estimated, disallowances under Section 40A(3) for cash payments and Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS should not be made.

Invensys Systems Inc. v. DIT
323 ITR 184 · 2010 · Reported
41
citing judgments

Payments for services are not taxable as fees for technical services (FTS) under a Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) if the services do not 'make available' any technical knowledge, know-how, or expertise to the recipient in India.

CIT v. Shree Synthetics Ltd.
162 ITR 819 · 1986 · High Court
39
citing judgments

Expenses incurred in connection with a public issue of shares or debentures are allowable as revenue expenditure eligible for deduction under section 35D of the Income-tax Act. This includes expenses related to Qualified Institutional Buyers (QIBs).

Sushee Hi Tech Constructions (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT
33 Taxmann.com 236 · 2013 · ITAT
34
citing judgments

Contracts involving development, operation, maintenance, financial involvement, and defect correction are eligible for deduction under section 80-IA(4), even when allotted by government bodies. Such contracts are not considered simple works contracts for the purpose of denying this deduction.

Judgments citing Section 4(3)(ia)