← All Phrases

“Section 2(35)(b)”

Section References (mined)Section 2Section 2(35)(b)4 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 2(35)(b) is CIT v. VTM Ltd. (319 ITR 336), cited in 49 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 2(35)(b)

CIT v. VTM Ltd.
319 ITR 336 · 2009 · High Court
49
citing judgments

An assessee engaged in the manufacture or production of an article or thing is entitled to additional depreciation under Section 32(1)(iia) for new machinery or plant, such as a windmill for power generation, even if it is not directly used in the primary manufacturing activity.

CIT v. V.S. Dempo & Co. Pvt. Ltd.
336 ITR 209 · 2011 · High Court
27
citing judgments

Disallowance under Section 40A(2)(b) is not maintainable when both the payer and payee are assessed at the maximum marginal rate, as it results in a revenue-neutral situation.

Velankani Information Systems Ltd. v. DCIT
97 Taxmann.com 599 · 2018 · ITAT
24
citing judgments

Interest paid on delayed remittances of service tax is compensatory in nature and not a penalty hit by the Explanation to Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, making it a allowable business expenditure.

Bennet Coleman & Co. Ltd. v. V.P. Damle, Third ITO
157 ITR 812 · 1986 · High Court
22
citing judgments

Interest chargeable under section 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act is not penal in nature and therefore cannot be waived on the basis of intentional default or other grounds.

Provimi Animal Nutrition India Private Limited v. PCIT
124 Taxmann.com 73 · 2021 · ITAT
17
citing judgments

The prescribed authority's failure to send intimation in Form 3CL does not disentitle an assessee from claiming deduction under section 35(2AB) of the Act. Amendments to Rule 6(7A) apply prospectively from July 1, 2016, meaning prior to this date, Form 3CL approval was not essential for the quantification of weighted deduction under section 35(2AB).

Goodyear India Ltd. v. ITO
118 TTJ 467 · 1994 · High Court
15
citing judgments

Royalty payments for technical know-how are revenue expenditure if they do not result in an enduring advantage in the capital field. The assessee is entitled to deduct such royalty payments as a revenue expenditure.

CIT V. Nav Bharat Duplex Ltd (2013) 35 Taxmann.com 289/217 (ix) Taxman 17 (All) CIT v. Bhaval Synthetics
35 Taxmann.com 83 · 2013 · High Court
14
citing judgments

Share application money received from non-residents requires scrutiny of the creditworthiness of the creditor and the source of funds, even if the transaction appears prima facie valid. Such scrutiny is essential for assessing the genuineness of the credit.

Sheo Narain Jaiswal & Ors. v. ITO
176 ITR 35 · High Court
10
citing judgments

Reassessment proceedings initiated by an Assessing Officer who does not exercise their jurisdiction independently but acts at the behest of a superior authority are invalid due to the non-satisfaction of a condition precedent.

Judgments citing Section 2(35)(b)