← All Phrases

“Section 57(4)”

Section References (mined)Section 57Section 57(4)1 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 57(4) is CIT v. Holcim India (P.) Ltd. (57 Taxmann.com 28), cited in 138 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 57(4)

CIT v. Holcim India (P.) Ltd.
57 Taxmann.com 28 · 2015 · High Court
138
citing judgments

Disallowance under Section 14A applies only when exempt income is actually received or receivable during the relevant previous year. The provision does not trigger merely upon incurring expenditure if no exempt income materialized in that year.

Kerala State Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank Ltd. v. Assessing Officer
154 Taxmann.com 305 · 2023 · Supreme Court
136
citing judgments

Section 80P(4) is not applicable to a cooperative bank unless it is classified as a 'bank' under the provisions of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. For cooperative banks not meeting this definition, the deduction for interest earned from investments in cooperative societies is available under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income-tax Act.

CIT v. Karnataka State Co-operative Apex Bank
251 ITR 194 · 2001 · Supreme Court
106
citing judgments

Interest income earned by a co-operative bank from statutory investments or mandatory deposits, which are essential for conducting its banking business, qualifies as business income and is exempt under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act.

79 Taxman 378/216 ITR 548 (Bom.) 4. CIT v. Macbrout Engineering (P.) Ltd.
52 Taxmann.com 219 · 2014 · High Court
43
citing judgments

If the Revenue accepts the Tribunal's decision for earlier years without challenge, it cannot assail the same decision in subsequent years, provided the facts are similar.

CIT v. Rampur Timber & Turnery Co. Ltd.
129 ITR 58 · 1981 · High Court
28
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred for the purpose of earning income is deductible under Section 57(iii) even if no income is actually earned. The earning of income is not a pre-condition for allowing the deduction.

ACIT v. Hukum Chand Jain
133 ITD 57 · 2011 · ITAT
13
citing judgments

Statements made under Section 132(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, during a search and seizure operation can be retracted, but such retractions must be substantiated.

Victoria Technical Institute v. ACIT
188 ITR 57 · 1991 · Supreme Court
13
citing judgments

To determine the predominant object of an entity for tax exemption purposes, the objects of the society should be examined, not merely the quantum of surplus generated. The quantum of surplus may become relevant in certain circumstances.

Judgments citing Section 57(4)