← All Phrases

“Section 123(1)”

Section References (mined)Section 123Section 123(1)1 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 123(1) is Govind Das v. ITO (103 ITR 123), cited in 83 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 123(1)

Govind Das v. ITO
103 ITR 123 · 1976 · Supreme Court
83
citing judgments

Taxing provisions imposing new liabilities or affecting substantive rights are presumed to operate prospectively unless the statute expressly or necessarily implies retrospective application. Retrospective operation is generally not given if it impairs existing rights, creates new obligations, or imposes new liabilities, except for procedural matters.

Mahalakshmi Sugar Mills Co. v. CIT
123 ITR 429 · 1980 · Supreme Court
70
citing judgments

Payments that are compensatory in nature, such as interest paid for the delayed payment of statutory dues like cess, are an allowable business deduction under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act. Such payments are not considered a penalty for an infringement of law.

237(Kar); CIT v. Sociedade De Fomento Industrial (P.) Ltd.
123 Taxmann.com 38 · 2021 · High Court
43
citing judgments

Interest expenditure cannot be disallowed under Section 14A read with Rule 8D when the assessee possesses sufficient interest-free funds to cover investments that yield exempt income, even if mixed funds are utilized.

Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. & Ors. v. State of Bihar
48 ITR 123 · 1963 · Supreme Court
43
citing judgments

An integrated business engaged in captive consumption derives profits or value from its internal activities, even when intermediate products are not sold externally. The principle that a person cannot make profits out of himself does not apply to deny profits from such internal operations for tax or cess purposes.

CIT v. Edward Keventer (Successors) Pvt. Ltd.
123 ITR 200 · 1980 · High Court
37
citing judgments

The subject matter of an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) is to be broadly construed, and the scope of such appeals extends to issues arising from the assessment order that are presented through the grounds of appeal.

Addl. CIT v. Indian Pharmaceuticals
123 ITR 874 · 1980 · High Court
37
citing judgments

The Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) cannot direct the Assessing Officer (AO) to initiate penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) in exercise of revisional power under Section 263 of the Act, if the AO had not initiated such proceedings in the assessment order.

123 ITR 874 (MP.), Addl. CIT v. Kantilal Jain
125 ITR 596 · 1980 · High Court
35
citing judgments

The Commissioner cannot direct the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) if the Assessing Officer did not initiate them in the assessment order, when exercising revisional powers under Section 263.

PCIT- 7 v. Tally Solutions (P.) Ltd.) (
123 Taxmann.com 21 · 2021 · High Court
32
citing judgments

Amounts referred to under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, are not deductible in computing income chargeable under the head 'Profits and gains of business or profession'.

Judgments citing Section 123(1)