← All Phrases

“Section 2(22)(iii)”

Section References (mined)Section 2Section 2(22)(iii)2 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 2(22)(iii) is Shambhu Investment (P) Ltd. v. CIT (263 ITR 143), cited in 181 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 2(22)(iii)

Shambhu Investment (P) Ltd. v. CIT
263 ITR 143 · 2003 · Supreme Court
181
citing judgments

Income derived from letting out property along with incidental use of furniture, fixtures, and common facilities is assessable as 'income from house property' and not 'business income' when the prime object is merely to let out and not to exploit the property as a business asset.

DCIT v. Core Health Care Ltd.
298 ITR 194 · 2008 · Supreme Court
165
citing judgments

Interest expenditure incurred for acquiring capital assets, even if capitalized in the books, is deductible if for the purpose of business. Section 36(1)(iii) is a self-contained code regarding such deductions.

CIT v. Oswal Agro Mills Ltd.
341 ITR 467 · 2012 · High Court
108
citing judgments

The Legislature abolished terminal depreciation under section 32(1)(iii) and the taxing of balancing charge under section 41(2), replacing these provisions with the requirement to reduce sale proceeds of depreciable assets from the block of assets.

CIT v. Shambhu Investment Pvt. Ltd.
249 ITR 47 · 2001 · High Court
57
citing judgments

Income from letting out immovable property, even with ancillary services, is taxable as 'Income from House Property' if the dominant intention is to exploit the property itself, not to run a complex business providing integrated services. The classification depends on the assessee's primary object in exploiting the property.

CIT v. Raymond Ltd.
21 Taxmann.com 60 · 2012 · High Court
48
citing judgments

The amount transferred to Debenture Redemption Reserve is to be excluded when computing book profit under section 115JB for the purpose of Minimum Alternate Tax.

CIT v. Modi Rubber Ltd.
378 ITR 128 · 2015 · High Court
18
citing judgments

Interest-free advances are presumed to be given out of owned funds, not borrowed funds, if the assessee has sufficient owned funds. The revenue cannot arbitrarily estimate proportionate interest expenditure when the assessee has the right to appropriate funds.

314 (Guj.), (iii) PCIT v. Shree Madhi Vibhag Khand Udhyog Sahakari Mandali Ltd.
171 Taxmann.com 22 · 2025 · High Court
15
citing judgments

Interest earned by a co-operative society from investments made with a co-operative bank is eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d). Section 80P(4) is attracted only when the assessee itself is a co-operative bank.

Azimganj Estate Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT
352 ITR 82 · 2013 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Rental income from unsold flats in a construction business is assessable as income from house property, not business income. Consequently, deductions under section 24(a) are allowable.

Judgments citing Section 2(22)(iii)