BharatTax.net
← All Phrases

“Section 266(3)”

Section References (mined)Section 266Section 266(3)2 judgments

JASJIT SINGH,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

ITA 4097/DEL/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 Mar 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri Kuldip Singh(Through Video Conference)

For Appellant: Shri Sachin Jain, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, Senior DR
Section 131Section 143Section 154

always be initiated against such payers. 9. Counsel for the revenue is correct in pointing out that for long after issuing notice under Section 266(3) of the Act, petitioner has not brought this fact to the notice of the respondent No. 2 which led the respondent

JASJIT SINGH,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

ITA 4096/DEL/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 Mar 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri Kuldip Singh(Through Video Conference)

For Appellant: Shri Sachin Jain, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, Senior DR
Section 131Section 143Section 154

always be initiated against such payers. 9. Counsel for the revenue is correct in pointing out that for long after issuing notice under Section 266(3) of the Act, petitioner has not brought this fact to the notice of the respondent No. 2 which led the respondent

Section 266(3) — 2 judgments | BharatTax | BharatTax