← All Phrases

“Section 63(2)”

Section References (mined)Section 63Section 63(2)1 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 63(2) is Smt. Sarifabibi Mohmed Ibrahim v. CIT (204 ITR 631), cited in 197 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 63(2)

Smt. Sarifabibi Mohmed Ibrahim v. CIT
204 ITR 631 · 1993 · Supreme Court
197
citing judgments

The determinative test for whether land is agricultural land or a capital asset is its actual user for agricultural purposes, not merely ownership. An explicit intention to stop cultivation or convert the land to non-agricultural use can cause it to lose its agricultural character, making its sale proceeds chargeable to capital gains tax.

CIT v. Shivanand Electronics
209 ITR 63 · 1994 · High Court
100
citing judgments

The requirement to file an audit report along with the return of income for claiming specified deductions, such as under Section 80J or 80-IA, is directory and not mandatory. Such an audit report can be filed at any time before the assessment is framed or completed under Section 143(1).

Swadeshi Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. v. CIT
63 ITR 57 · 1967 · Supreme Court
67
citing judgments

The question of whether an amount claimed as an expenditure was laid out wholly and exclusively for business purposes must be decided based on the facts and circumstances of each case. The Income-tax Officer retains the discretion to determine the deductibility of an expense, and the mere existence of an agreement or actual payment does not bind the officer to allow the deduction under Section 37.

Bombay in Bajaj Auto Finance Ltd. v. CIT
93 Taxmann.com 63 · 2018 · High Court
53
citing judgments

The Assessing Officer cannot make a prima facie adjustment to the total income under Section 143(1)(a) if the adjustment involves a debatable issue.

Nagpur v. Lalitkumar Bardia
404 ITR 63 · 2018 · High Court
37
citing judgments

A notice issued by an Assessing Officer without proper jurisdiction renders all subsequent proceedings void. The authority for issuing such a notice must be the Assessing Officer alone.

COT v. Marsons Beneficiary Trust
201 ITR 989 · 1993 · High Court
36
citing judgments

An assessee cannot be treated as an Association of Persons (AOP) if the beneficiaries have not come together with a common purpose of earning income.

CIT v. Parle Plastic Ltd.
332 ITR 63 · 2011 · High Court
27
citing judgments

A loan or advance received by an assessee cannot be treated as such for the relevant previous year if it was not advanced by the lender during that year, even if there was an opening credit balance.

Techbooks International (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-3, Noida
63 Taxmann.com 114 · 2015 · High Court
22
citing judgments

The determination of Arm's Length Price (ALP) for international transactions involving debt requires consideration of both the amount on which interest should be charged and the arm's length rate for that interest. Guidelines are provided for computing the ALP of the international transaction of 'debt arising during the course of business.'

Judgments citing Section 63(2)

Section 63(2) — 1 case laws | BharatTax