← All Phrases

“Section 62(1)(a)”

Section References (mined)Section 62Section 62(1)(a)1 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 62(1)(a) is Rotork Controls India Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (314 ITR 62), cited in 739 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 62(1)(a)

Rotork Controls India Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT
314 ITR 62 · 2009 · Supreme Court
739
citing judgments

A provision for expenses, such as warranty, is a deductible liability for income tax purposes if it constitutes a present obligation arising from past events, and a reliable estimate of the amount of obligation is possible.

Kishore Kumar v. Dy. CIT
62 Taxmann.com 215 · 2015 · Supreme Court
212
citing judgments

A sworn statement recorded under Section 132(4) during a search and seizure operation is a strong piece of evidence for assessing undisclosed income, particularly when supported by subsequent actions like filing returns and paying taxes on the admitted income.

CIT v. Malayalam Plantations Ltd.
53 ITR 140 · 1964 · Supreme Court
201
citing judgments

The expression "for the purpose of business" is wider in scope than "for the purpose of earning profits" and encompasses expenditures made for commercial expediency, business preservation, administration, and modernization.

B Kishore Kumar v. DCIT
234 Taxmann 771 · 2015 · Supreme Court
135
citing judgments

This Supreme Court decision is cited as authority in search and seizure assessment proceedings.

CIT v. Pfizer Ltd.
330 ITR 62 · 2011 · High Court
78
citing judgments

An insurance claim received on stock in trade constitutes business income and is not an independent source of income.

CIT v. Motors & General Stores
66 ITR 692 · 1967 · Supreme Court
66
citing judgments

Income tax authorities cannot deduce the nature of a document from purported intention, go behind the document, consider the substance over form, or rewrite it merely to suit the revenue's purpose.

Madras in M/s South Indian Surgical Corporation Ltd. v. CIT
287 ITR 62 · 2006 · High Court
54
citing judgments

A deduction for a bad debt requires more than just pessimism about recovery; the assessee must be honestly convinced of the debtor's precarious financial position, particularly if the debt is owed by a government department or hospital where payment may depend on available funds.

Government Wood Works v. State of Kerala
69 STC 62 · 1988 · High Court
54
citing judgments

An assessment order is time-barred if the department fails to prove that the order was dispatched within the prescribed period of limitation. The burden lies on the department to make the dispatch date available from records to establish timely issuance.

Judgments citing Section 62(1)(a)