← All Phrases

“Section 262(1)”

Section References (mined)Section 262Section 262(1)1 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 262(1) is Karimtharuvi Tea Estate Ltd. v. State of Kerala (60 ITR 262), cited in 136 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 262(1)

Karimtharuvi Tea Estate Ltd. v. State of Kerala
60 ITR 262 · 1966 · Supreme Court
136
citing judgments

The law applicable for an assessment year is the law as it stands amended on the first day of April of that financial year. Any amendments coming into force after April 1st do not apply to the assessments for that year.

3. CIT v. ASHOK KUMAR SONI
262 ITR 633 · 2003 · High Court
101
citing judgments

This case is cited for the proposition that oral admissions made during the course of a search can be considered as evidence.

South Indian Bank Ltd. v. CIT
262 ITR 579 · 2003 · High Court
48
citing judgments

For banks, bad debts written off from non-rural advances are not subject to the limitations of the provisos to sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viii), as these provisos apply only to rural advances; section 36(1)(viia) also applies exclusively to rural advances. Additionally, depreciation on investments valued at market price on the balance sheet date is eligible for deduction.

Chemplast Sanmar Ltd. v. DCIT
83 TTJ 427 · 2004 · ITAT
29
citing judgments

The ITAT decision in Chemplast Sanmar Ltd. v. DCIT is authority for the proposition that no interference is called for in an impugned order when no contrary decision has been placed on record.

CIT v. KKK West Germany
262 ITR 513 · 2003 · High Court
25
citing judgments

Income from royalties or fees for technical services paid to a non-resident is not taxable in India if it is for the purpose of earning income from outside India or for carrying on business outside India, aligning with the exclusionary clauses of Section 9(1)(vii)(b).

262 ITR 260 (Delhi) and Commissioner of Income Tax-VI v. Worldwide Townships Project Ltd.
367 ITR 433 · 2014 · High Court
13
citing judgments

Transactions settled by journal entry, without actual cash movement, do not violate Section 269SS or Section 269T, and consequently, penalties under Section 271D or Section 271E are not leviable.

9(1)(vii). CIT v. Sundwiger Mfgr. & Co.
262 ITR 110 · 2003 · High Court
11
citing judgments

Customizing design, supply, and installation services that form part of an outright sale of equipment do not attract Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) under Section 9(1)(vii) Explanation 2 of the Income Tax Act.

Cherian Varkey Construction CO.(P.) Ltd. v. UOI
406 ITR 262 · 2018 · High Court
10
citing judgments

Making Ready Mix Concrete (RMC) is considered a manufacturing process, entitling assessees engaged in construction to additional depreciation on plant and machinery used in this activity.

Judgments citing Section 262(1)