← All Phrases

“Section 172(3)”

Section References (mined)Section 172Section 172(3)4 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 172(3) is Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. v. CIT (227 ITR 172), cited in 621 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 172(3)

Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. v. CIT
227 ITR 172 · 1997 · Supreme Court
621
citing judgments

Interest income earned on deposits, particularly before the commencement of business operations or as a requirement for business licensing, is taxable as "income from other sources" under Section 56, and cannot be treated as business income or set off against interest on borrowed funds.

Chuharmal v. CIT
172 ITR 250 · 1988 · Supreme Court
340
citing judgments

The expression 'income' under Section 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, has a wide meaning, encompassing anything that comes in or results in gain. Therefore, an assessee's unexplained investments, such as purchasing articles or depositing cash, can legitimately be inferred and deemed as income under this section.

CIT v. Associated Cement Companies Ltd.
172 ITR 257 · 1988 · Supreme Court
126
citing judgments

An expenditure is classified as either capital or revenue; the 'enduring benefit' test is a key criterion for this distinction, and income tax law does not generally recognize deferred revenue expenditure unless specifically provided.

110 (Bom) PCIT v. Hitesh Mody (HUF)
172 Taxmann.com 283 · 2025 · High Court
98
citing judgments

When an assessee fails to discharge the onus of proving the genuineness of purchases and their source, the entire value of such bogus purchases is added as unexplained expenditure under Section 69C, rejecting any estimation of a profit rate.

Dinshaw Darabshaw Shroff v. CIT
11 ITR 172 · 1943 · High Court
70
citing judgments

An Assessing Officer acts in a quasi-judicial capacity during assessment and must follow elementary rules of judicial procedure, conducting the case personally without interference from superiors.

Trust (249 ITR 533) (Bom.) 3. CIT vs. Red Rose School (163 Taxman 19 (All.) 4. DIT(E) v. Alarippu (
172 ITR 698 · 1988 · High Court
61
citing judgments

Income received by a trust from sources like extra fees can be taxed at the maximum marginal rate, while other income remains eligible for exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act.

CIT(A) v. Eon Technology Pvt. Ltd.
343 ITR 366 · 2012 · High Court
58
citing judgments

Payments to a non-resident agent for services rendered outside India, where the agent has no permanent establishment (PE) or business connection in India, are not chargeable to tax in India. Consequently, there is no obligation to deduct tax at source under Section 195, and no disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) can be made.

Ramprasad Aggarwal v. ITO 2(3)(2), Mumbai
100 Taxmann.com 172 · 2018 · ITAT
53
citing judgments

The ITAT Jaipur Bench, in the context of search and seizure action under section 132(1), refers to this case alongside other decisions, indicating its relevance in matters arising from search and seizure.

Judgments citing Section 172(3)

Lr2 Management K/S [As Foreign Commr. Manager/Agent of Principal Freight Beneficiary, Torm A/S], Jamnagar vs. The Deputy Comissioner of Income Tax, Inter. Taxa., Rajkot-Gujarat

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 300/RJT/2017[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Rajkot15 Feb 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Smt. Madhumita Royassessment Year :2013-14 Lrs Management K/S (As Foreign Vs. Dcit (International Commercial Manager/ Agent Of Taxation), Rajkot. Principal Freight Beneficiary, Torm Gujarat. A/S) Correspondence Address: Interocean Shipping India P.Ltd. 301-Milestone P.N. Marg, Panchwati, Opp: Triveni Apartments Jamnagar 361 002. 0 अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/(Respondent) Assesseeby : Shri Manish Kanth, Ld.Ar Revenue By : Shri Shramdeep Sinha, Ld.Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 13/02/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 15/02/2023

For Appellant: Shri Manish Kanth, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Shramdeep Sinha, ld.CIT-DR
Section 172(3)Section 250Section 271(1)(c)

assessee contended that the assessee being an agent of a freight beneficiary, it was required to file voyage returns as per section 172(3) of the Act, which fact, he pointed out was noted in the assessment order also, and these returns were required to be filed in form ... filing return of income wasbeing a voyage return filed by the agent on behalf of the freight beneficiary, as per the provisions of section 172(3) of the Act, the filing of the return was to be in form VVR i.e. voyage return, as canvassed by the Ld.Counsel