← All Phrases

“Section 206(1)”

Section References (mined)Section 206Section 206(1)1 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 206(1) is CIT v. Nangalia Fabrics (P.) Ltd. (40 Taxmann.com 206), cited in 62 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 206(1)

CIT v. Nangalia Fabrics (P.) Ltd.
40 Taxmann.com 206 · 2013 · High Court
62
citing judgments

Where purchases are supported by bills, reflected in books of account, and payments are made through account payee cheques, such purchases cannot be treated as bogus in the absence of specific contrary evidence from the Assessing Officer.

CIT v. V.S. Dempo and Co. P CIT Vs. V.S. Dempo and Co. P Ltd.
206 ITR 291 · 1994 · High Court
54
citing judgments

Losses arising from the conversion of foreign currency or from foreign exchange forward contracts entered into for business transactions, such as hedging export proceeds, are considered revenue or trading losses and are deductible as business expenditure under Section 37(1). The amortization of premium paid on such foreign exchange contracts is also an allowable deduction.

ITR 93) (Guj.) VIII. CIT vs Deep Chand 336 ITR 292 (P & H) IX. Sethy Industries Corporation v. DCIT
353 ITR 206 · 2013 · High Court
18
citing judgments

An assessment order directing the initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) is deemed to constitute the Assessing Officer's satisfaction for initiating penalty proceedings under section 271(1B). This applies even after amendments to the law.

Sun Pharmaceuticals Ind. Ltd. v. DCIT
227 CTR 206 · 2009 · High Court
13
citing judgments

Expenditure on the right to use leasehold land is allowable as revenue expenditure. Such an issue, being debatable, can preclude the levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c).

Amiya Kumar Roy & Bros. v. CIT
206 ITR 306 · 1994 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Non-maintenance of stock by an assessee, which has a substantial effect on profit determination, justifies an inference that accounts were not maintained properly, allowing for estimation of income.

206 (SC) Aroni Commercials Ltd. v. DCIT
393 ITR 673 · 2017 · High Court
11
citing judgments

Reopening of assessment is invalid if based solely on a change of opinion by the Assessing Officer without any tangible material.

Judgments citing Section 206(1)