DCIT 27(1) , MUMBAI vs. M/S. GANGA DEVELOPERS, MUMBAI
ITA 2328/MUM/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Oct 2022AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shripavan Kumar Gadale, Jm Dcit 27(1) R No.406, 4Th Floor, Tower M/S Ganga Developers Plot No. 219, Alal Asia, No.6, 11Th Road, Chembur, Vashi Railway Stn Complex, Vs. Vashi, Navi Mumbai Mumbai-400 071 Mumbai-400 703 (Respondent) (Appellant) Pan No. Aaafg 8230 C Assessee By : Shri J.P. Bairagra, Ar Revenue By : Shri Jasbir Chouhan, Dr Date Of Hearing: 13.07.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 12.10.2022
For Appellant: Shri J.P. Bairagra, ARFor Respondent: Shri Jasbir Chouhan, DR
Section 10(37)Section 11Section 143(3)Section 96
considered as posing a hurdle as contended for by the appellant, we think this result can be overcome by a liberal interpretation of section 297(2)(k). This clause reads:
M/s Ganga Developers; A.Y. 17–18
"297. Repeals and Savings.- (1) **
(2)(a) to (j) **
(k)any agreement entered into ... accordingly laid down a guideline to be followed in cases where a new Act has repealed the earlier Act. The provisions of section 297(2)(k) are similar to the provisions of section 24 of the General Clauses Act and allow a similar interpretation. Any award, although initiated under