← All Phrases

“Section 24(7)”

Section References (mined)Section 24Section 24(7)8 judgments

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. KAVYA BOPPANA, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 696/HYD/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Jun 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha G, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali MohanFor Respondent: Ms. TH Vijaya Lakshmi
Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 50C

sale consideration of Rs.5,45,02,449/- in the F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y. 2018-19 only. Therefore, transfer as defined under section 24(7) of the Act is completed in the F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y. 2018-19 and the assessee needs to offer capital gain

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. JHANSI RANI BOPPANA, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 694/HYD/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Jun 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha G, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali MohanFor Respondent: Ms. TH Vijaya Lakshmi
Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 50C

sale consideration of Rs.5,45,02,449/- in the F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y. 2018-19 only. Therefore, transfer as defined under section 24(7) of the Act is completed in the F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y. 2018-19 and the assessee needs to offer capital gain

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. TARA CHAND BOPPANA, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 692/HYD/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Jun 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha G, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali MohanFor Respondent: Ms. TH Vijaya Lakshmi
Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 50C

sale consideration of Rs.5,45,02,449/- in the F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y. 2018-19 only. Therefore, transfer as defined under section 24(7) of the Act is completed in the F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y. 2018-19 and the assessee needs to offer capital gain

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. SARAT GOPAL BOPPANA, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 690/HYD/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Jun 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha G, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali MohanFor Respondent: Ms. TH Vijaya Lakshmi
Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 50C

sale consideration of Rs.5,45,02,449/- in the F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y. 2018-19 only. Therefore, transfer as defined under section 24(7) of the Act is completed in the F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y. 2018-19 and the assessee needs to offer capital gain

TARA CHAND BOPPANA,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 646/HYD/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Jun 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha G, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali MohanFor Respondent: Ms. TH Vijaya Lakshmi
Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 50C

sale consideration of Rs.5,45,02,449/- in the F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y. 2018-19 only. Therefore, transfer as defined under section 24(7) of the Act is completed in the F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y. 2018-19 and the assessee needs to offer capital gain

KAVYA BOPPANA,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 642/HYD/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Jun 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha G, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali MohanFor Respondent: Ms. TH Vijaya Lakshmi
Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 50C

sale consideration of Rs.5,45,02,449/- in the F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y. 2018-19 only. Therefore, transfer as defined under section 24(7) of the Act is completed in the F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y. 2018-19 and the assessee needs to offer capital gain

SARAT GOPAL BOPPANA,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 638/HYD/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Jun 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha G, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali MohanFor Respondent: Ms. TH Vijaya Lakshmi
Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 50C

sale consideration of Rs.5,45,02,449/- in the F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y. 2018-19 only. Therefore, transfer as defined under section 24(7) of the Act is completed in the F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y. 2018-19 and the assessee needs to offer capital gain

SARAT GOPAL BOPPANA,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3),, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 637/HYD/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Jun 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha G, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali MohanFor Respondent: Ms. TH Vijaya Lakshmi
Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 50C

sale consideration of Rs.5,45,02,449/- in the F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y. 2018-19 only. Therefore, transfer as defined under section 24(7) of the Act is completed in the F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y. 2018-19 and the assessee needs to offer capital gain

Section 24(7) — 8 judgments | BharatTax | BharatTax