← All Phrases

“Section 254(6)”

Section References (mined)Section 254Section 254(6)1 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 254(6) is CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. (349 ITR 98), cited in 818 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 254(6)

CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd.
349 ITR 98 · 2012 · High Court
818
citing judgments

When computing deduction under Section 10A, if communication or telecommunication expenses are excluded from export turnover, they must also be excluded from total turnover to maintain consistency and apply the ordinary meaning of 'turnover' in context.

CIT v. Jagatjit Industries Ltd.
339 ITR 382 · 2011 · High Court
45
citing judgments

An assessee's consistently followed accounting method, if previously accepted by the Department, cannot be rejected by the tax authorities unless they establish that it distorts the true profits. The doctrine of consistency applies.

Delhi in CIT v. Best Plastics (P) Ltd.
295 ITR 256 · 2007 · High Court
41
citing judgments

Assessment orders passed by an Assessing Officer are liable to be set aside if they disregard binding instructions or circulars issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), especially concerning the selection of returns for scrutiny. The CBDT circulars are binding on all officers of the Income-tax department.

CIT v. Lucas T.V.S. Limited
249 ITR 306 · 2001 · Supreme Court
36
citing judgments

For reopening an assessment, the Assessing Officer must have a reason to believe that income has escaped assessment, not merely a reason to suspect. The Assessing Officer needs tangible material to form this belief.

C.C.AIavi Haji v. Palapatty Muhammed
6 SCC 555 · 2007 · Reported
16
citing judgments

When a notice is sent by registered post to the correct address, it is deemed to have been served at the time it would ordinarily be delivered, unless the contrary is proven by the addressee. This principle applies even if the notice is returned unserved.

Solid Containers Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
308 ITR 407 · Reported
14
citing judgments

Waiver of a loan taken for trading activity results in income taxable under section 41(1). However, a loan taken for the purchase of a capital asset, which was never allowed as a deduction, does not constitute trading liabilities and its waiver is not taxable under section 41(1).

209 CTR 97 5. Puneet Bhagat Vs. ITO (157 ITD353) 6. Addl. CIT v. Shri Chandrakant V Gosalia
63 Taxmann.com 97 · 2015 · High Court
14
citing judgments

The amount treated as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) is calculated after deducting repayments made during the year from the amount received.

CIT v. Softworks Computers Pvt. Ltd.
354 ITR 16 · 2013 · High Court
12
citing judgments

A loan taken for the acquisition of a capital asset, when subsequently waived, is not chargeable to tax.

Judgments citing Section 254(6)