BHARAT TECHNOLOGIES AUTO COMPONENTS LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ITO, COMPANY WARD 1(1), CHENNAI
In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical
ITA 1843/CHNY/2024[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Nov 2024AY 2006-07
Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1841, 1842 & 1843/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2003-04, 2004-05 & 2006-07 V. M/S. Bharat Technologies Auto – The Ito, Components Ltd., Company Ward-1(1), 177 Raheja Towers, Chennai. 7Th Floor, Unit No.708, Beta Wing, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. [Pan: Aabcb 9835 A] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)
For Appellant: Mr.S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. R. Anita, Addl.CIT
Section 41(1)(b)Section 72ASection 72A(2)
erred in sustaining the addition of Rs. 4,11,40,145/- presumed to be the sum received as concessional relief in terms of Section 41(1)(b) of the Act in the computation of taxable total income without assigning proper reasons and justification.
12. The NFAC, Delhi failed to appreciate ... that provisions of Section 41(1)(b) of the Act had no application to the factual matrix of the present case and ought to have appreciated that the mechanical action in bringing to tax the disputed sum in terms of Section 41(1)(b) of the Act should be reckoned