← All Phrases

“Section 2(93)”

Section References (mined)Section 2Section 2(93)1 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 2(93) is 82 ITR 363 (SC); Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. v. CIT (93 Taxmann 502), cited in 72 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 2(93)

82 ITR 363 (SC); Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. v. CIT
93 Taxmann 502 · 1997 · Supreme Court
72
citing judgments

Interest income earned by an assessee during the period when its business has not commenced, even from funds meant for capital expenditure, is revenue in nature and is assessable under the head 'income from other sources'. The nature of the income, rather than the source of the funds generating it, determines its taxability.

Bombay in Bajaj Auto Finance Ltd. v. CIT
93 Taxmann.com 63 · 2018 · High Court
53
citing judgments

The Assessing Officer cannot make a prima facie adjustment to the total income under Section 143(1)(a) if the adjustment involves a debatable issue.

CIT v. Madhur Housing and Development Company
401 ITR 152 · 2018 · Supreme Court
49
citing judgments

A loan or advance from a closely held company to a 'concern' where a common shareholder has a substantial interest is not a deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) for the 'concern' if it is not a shareholder of the lending company. Deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) is taxable only in the hands of the registered or beneficial shareholder.

Bai Sonabai Hirji Agiary Trust v. ITO
93 ITD 70 · 2005 · ITAT
39
citing judgments

For the purpose of accumulation of income under section 11(1)(a), the calculation is to be made on the gross receipts of the trust before deducting any expenses. This interpretation is based on the plain language of section 11(1)(a) and is supported by Supreme Court decisions.

ITR 93) (Guj.) VIII. CIT vs Deep Chand 336 ITR 292 (P & H) IX. Sethy Industries Corporation v. DCIT
353 ITR 206 · 2013 · High Court
18
citing judgments

An assessment order directing the initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) is deemed to constitute the Assessing Officer's satisfaction for initiating penalty proceedings under section 271(1B). This applies even after amendments to the law.

Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd vs. CIT ( 93 Taxmann 502); CIT v. Woodward Governor India (P) Ltd (
418 ITR 662 · 2019 · Supreme Court
16
citing judgments

The Court held that unless there is tangible material to believe that income has escaped assessment, reassessment proceedings cannot be initiated merely on a change of opinion by the Assessing Officer. The absence of independent material vitiates the reassessment.

Oriental Bank of Commerce v. ACIT
93 Taxmann.com 432 · 2018 · High Court
10
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred by an assessee for a license to use software is eligible for revenue expenditure deduction under section 37(1) if it does not confer an enduring benefit on the assessee.

Judgments citing Section 2(93)