AVTAR SINGH DHEERAN,DELHI vs. ITO, WARD- 66(5), NEW DELHI
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 403/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Jun 2021AY 2014-15
Bench: Shri R.K. Pandaassessment Year: 2014-15 Avtar Singh Dheeran, Vs Ito, C/O Kapil Goel, Advocate, Ward-66(5), G-26/124, Sector-7, New Delhi. Rohini, New Delhi. Pan: Aaipd8887G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Kapil Goel, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Rajesh Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 20.04.2021 Date Of Pronouncement : 10.06.2021 Order
For Appellant: Shri Kapil Goel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Sr. DR
regards the issue of deduction of Rs 5,50,000/-on account of transfer charges it may be mentioned that as per section 49(1 )(iii)(a) of IT Act the cost of acquisition of asset will be increased by the cost of any improvement of the asset incurred ... expenditure which may have qualitatively improved the assets. Therefore, the claim of the assessee was prima facie not covered under the provisions of section 49(1)(iii)(a) of IT . Act, 1961. As regards the another issue of not allowing the benefit of cost of construction/indexed cost of construction