← All Phrases

“Section 159(2)(a)(b)”

Section References (mined)Section 159Section 159(2)(a)(b)1 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 159(2)(a)(b) is Rajender Kumar Sehgal v. ITO (260 Taxmann 412), cited in 25 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 159(2)(a)(b)

Rajender Kumar Sehgal v. ITO
260 Taxmann 412 · 2019 · High Court
25
citing judgments

A notice issued to a deceased assessee or their legal representatives beyond the period of limitation is without jurisdiction and cannot be saved by Section 292B.

ITO Ward 1(3)(7), Surat v. Durlabhbhai Kanubhai Rajpara
114 Taxmann.com 482 · 2020 · Supreme Court
24
citing judgments

An assessment or reassessment proceeding initiated or continued against a deceased person after their demise is illegal and void ab initio, as no valid notice can be issued to a dead individual.

Sumit Balkrishna Gupta v. Asstt. CIT
103 Taxmann.com 188 · 2019 · High Court
23
citing judgments

A notice for reassessment issued in the name of a deceased person is void ab initio and cannot be validated by curative provisions like Section 292B or 292BB, as issuing notice to the correct person is a fundamental jurisdictional requirement.

Vikram Bhatnagar v. ACIT
147 Taxmann.com 254 · 2023 · High Court
16
citing judgments

An assessment order passed against a deceased person, even if initiated after death, is null and void and must be set aside, especially when the return was filed by the legal representative.

1. CIT v. Laxman Das Khandewal
414 ITR 286 · 2019 · High Court
13
citing judgments

An assessment order is bad in law if a notice under section 143(2) is not issued. However, if the assessee does not file a return within the time specified in a notice issued under section 148, and the return is treated as invalid, the Assessing Officer may not need to issue a notice under section 143(2).

Bharti Harendra Modi v. ITO
420 ITR 226 · 2020 · High Court
11
citing judgments

An assessment notice issued under Section 148 to a deceased assessee without impleading their legal representative is invalid and the proceedings are void ab initio. The notice must be served on the legal representative as per Section 159(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act.

CLSA India (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT
149 Taxmann.com 380 · 2023 · High Court
10
citing judgments

An active Permanent Account Number (PAN) for a non-existent entity, post-amalgamation, does not justify reassessment proceedings against that entity. The revenue cannot rely on an active PAN to dilute established legal principles regarding the assessment of merged entities.

Judgments citing Section 159(2)(a)(b)