← All Phrases

“Section 87(2)(a)”

Section References (mined)Section 87Section 87(2)(a)1 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 87(2)(a) is CIT v. Gillanders Arbuthnot & Co. (87 ITR 407), cited in 51 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 87(2)(a)

CIT v. Gillanders Arbuthnot & Co.
87 ITR 407 · 1973 · Supreme Court
51
citing judgments

The "full value of the consideration" for computing capital gains under Section 48 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (or Section 12B(2) of the 1922 Act), means the price actually bargained for and agreed to by the parties, not the market value of the asset transferred. In a sale transaction involving a price, the market value of the consideration is not relevant.

CIT v. Smifs Securities Ltd.
87 Taxmann.com 82 · 2017 · High Court
38
citing judgments

Depreciation is allowable on goodwill as an intangible asset under Section 32(1)(ii) when it arises from a scheme of amalgamation or similar corporate restructuring.

Council), V.Damodaran v. CIT Kerala 64 ITR 26(Ker.), Champion Engineering Works Ltd. v. CIT
87 ITR 650 · 1973 · High Court
32
citing judgments

A payment made to eliminate competition is a capital expenditure, not a deductible business expense, as it secures an enduring benefit.

(India) (P.) Ltd. v. ITO
87 Taxmann.com 251 · 2017 · High Court
25
citing judgments

Interest on outstanding receivables arising during business is considered an international transaction under the definition of 'capital financing'.

87 ITR 83 and Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation v. CIT
100 ITR 392 · 1975 · High Court
15
citing judgments

The crucial aspect for an organisation to qualify for an exemption based on the advancement of general public utility is the object of that utility itself, not its actual accomplishment or attainment. The requirement that such an object must not involve carrying on an activity for profit applies to the object, not its implementation.

Western India Bakers (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT
87 ITD 607 · 2003 · ITAT
14
citing judgments

Section 40A(3) disallowance cannot be applied when assessment is based on undisclosed investment, as this section applies only when genuine expenditure is incurred but the mandate of Section 40A(3) is violated.

CIT v. Jindal Equipments Leasing & Consultancy Services Ltd.
325 ITR 87 · 2010 · High Court
11
citing judgments

This case addresses the tax treatment of a loan written off by a creditor as income of the debtor, particularly when the debtor is a Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC). The judgment explores whether such a write-off constitutes income for the assessee in the absence of proper inquiry by the Assessing Officer.

Judgments citing Section 87(2)(a)