HEMA DALJIT SINGH CHADHA,MUMBAI vs. ITO 23(1)(5), MUMBAI
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is fully allowed
ITA 887/MUM/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Oct 2022AY 2011-12
Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Gagan Goyalsmt. Hema Daljit Singh Chadha, Flat No. 204, Grant Canyon, Opp. Hdfc Bank, Pali Hill, Bandra West, Mumbai-400050. Pan: Acxpc0971B ...... Appellant Vs. Ito-23(1)(5), Room No. 114, Matru Mandir, 1St Floor, Tardeo Road, Mumbai-400007 ..... Respondent Appellant By : None Respondent By : Sh. Tejinder Pal Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 14/07/2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 10/10/2022 Order Per Gagan Goyal, A.M:
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Tejinder Pal Singh, Sr. DR
Section 139(4)Section 2(47)Section 54
Chadha
“1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CII-4A) erred in holding that provisions of section 2(47)(1) are applicable in my case ignoring the fact that the period of holding the asset was 37 months as the final payment