“Section 289(1)”

Section References (mined)Section 289Section 289(1)2 judgments

DCIT (EXEMPTION)- 2(1), MUMBAI vs. MAHARASHTRA ENERGY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, MUMBAI

ITA 1765/MUM/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jun 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Kishore PhadkeFor Respondent: Smt. Sanyogita Nagpal

Assessee/MEDA that Assessee was not carrying on any trading activity and therefore, the Assessee was entitled to claim benefit of exemption under Section 289(1) of the Constitution. On perusal of the above extract of the judgment, it is clear that the aforesaid contention was rejected

ACIT-3(2)(1), MUMBAI vs. MAHARASHTRA AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD., MUMBAI

ITA 7498/MUM/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 Mar 2024AY 2008-09

Section 80I

Section 263", "Section 264", "Section 40(1)(b)", "Section 124A", "Section 115JB", "Section 113", "Section 114(2)", "Section 115", "Section 155", "Section 160", "Section 289(1)"], "issues": "The core issue revolves around the taxability of various receipts by the assessee, including interest on fixed deposits, grant-in-aid, and development