THE M K TATA TRUST ,MUMBAI vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), MUMBAI
In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed
ITA 1742/MUM/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Sept 2024AY 2015-16
Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhan
For Appellant: Shri Vishal D Shah & Shri Jainam SonaiyaFor Respondent: Shri S. Srinivasu, CIT, DR
Section 11Section 11(5)Section 11(6)Section 13(1)(d)Section 143(3)Section 263
such a situation, is wholly academic. The benefit given under proviso to Section 13(1)(d) cannot be taken away by invoking Section 15(2)(h). In response to a question raised, the Departmental Representative could not even point out as to which specified person under section 13(3) needs