DCIT CIRCLE - 16(1), NEW DELHI vs. ARUNA CHANDHOK, NEW DELHI
In the result, we do not find any merit in this appeal, the same fails and is hereby dismissed
ITA 387/DEL/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 Sept 2023AY 2015-16
Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Anubhav Sharmadcit, Vs. Smt Aruna Chandhok, Circle-16(1), H-30, Sainik Farms, New Delhi Delhi-110062 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaepc7861R
For Appellant: Sh. Pradeep Dinodia, CAFor Respondent: Shri P. Praveen Sidharth, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 55(2)(aa)Section 56(2)(vii)
shares would not be income at all. It was also submitted that cost of bonus shares would be Rs Nil in terms of section 55(2)(aa)(i) of the Act.
5. The ld. CIT(A) duly distinguished the various case laws relied upon by the ld. AO. We find ... sale of bonus shares as and when it happens because cost of acquisition of bonus shares is nil as per the provisions of section 55(2)(aa)(i) of the Income Tax Act.
Smt Aruna Chandhok
9.13 The AO also erred in concluding that the provisions of section 55(2