← All Phrases

“Section 215(3)”

Section References (mined)Section 215Section 215(3)2 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 215(3) is Kishore Kumar v. Dy. CIT (62 Taxmann.com 215), cited in 212 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 215(3)

Kishore Kumar v. Dy. CIT
62 Taxmann.com 215 · 2015 · Supreme Court
212
citing judgments

A sworn statement recorded under Section 132(4) during a search and seizure operation is a strong piece of evidence for assessing undisclosed income, particularly when supported by subsequent actions like filing returns and paying taxes on the admitted income.

Gujarat in CIT v. Minalben S. Parikh
215 ITR 81 · 1995 · High Court
110
citing judgments

A loss of tax incurred by the Revenue is considered prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. This interpretation is key for invoking the revisionary powers under Section 263.

East India Commercial Co. Ltd. v. Collector of Customs
3 SCR 338 · 1963 · Reported
66
citing judgments

The law declared by a High Court is binding on all subordinate authorities and tribunals within its territorial jurisdiction.

Triveni Engg. Works Ltd. v. CIT
144 ITR 732 · 1983 · High Court
61
citing judgments

Interest on arrears of tax is compensatory in nature, not penal, and is therefore an allowable deduction under the Income-tax Act. This decision reversed a previous Full Bench ruling.

CIT v. Patel Bros. & Co. Ltd.
215 ITR 165 · 1995 · Supreme Court
60
citing judgments

This case establishes that a statutory amendment, specifically Section 9(1)(ii) relating to income deemed to accrue or arise in India (salary for services/leave), applies prospectively from its effective date, such as April 1, 2000.

CIT v. Madras Fertilisers Ltd.
149 ITR 703 · 1984 · High Court
55
citing judgments

Interest under Section 215 of the Income Tax Act is not leviable if tax was deductible at source but was not deducted by the payer. The liability for advance tax on interest income and the corresponding interest liability for non-payment arises only when the payer has failed to deduct tax at source.

Phaltan Sugar Works Ltd. v. CIT
215 ITR 582 · 1995 · High Court
49
citing judgments

Interest on borrowed capital used for purposes not directly related to the assessee's immediate business, such as providing interest-free advances or investing in a subsidiary's shares, is not deductible under Section 36(1)(iii) due to a restrictive interpretation of "for the purposes of business."

Guttigedarara Credit Co-operative Society Ltd. v. ITO
60 Taxmann.com 215 · 2015 · High Court
27
citing judgments

Interest derived by a cooperative society from its investments, other than those in cooperative societies, is eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i). The denial of this deduction by the CIT(A) is unsustainable.

Judgments citing Section 215(3)