TRENISTONE D SANGMA,AMPATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,, WARD - GOALPARA
In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 285/GTY/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2016-17
Bench: Shri Manomohan Das, Hon’Ble & Shri Sanjay Awasthi, Hon’Ble
For Appellant: Ashok Sharma, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Jha, JCIT
Section 10(26)Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 149(4)(b)Section 250Section 69A
observe that, the ld. CIT(A) did not entertain the appeal of the assessee due to non-payment of advance tax as per section 149(4)(b) of the Act. The assessee was enquired by the ld. CIT(A) whether the assessee has paid tax or not. The assessee replied ... that, he is not liable to pay income tax. The ld. CIT(A) observed that, the assessee has ignored the provisions of section 149(4)(b) of the Act and therefore, the appeal of the assessee was not admitted by the ld. CIT(A).
6.1 We observe that, the assessee