← All Phrases

“Section 154(2)”

Section References (mined)Section 154Section 154(2)8 judgments

ARTI SAREEN,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, GURGAON

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2087/DEL/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Aug 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Sh. Sudhir Pareek

For Appellant: Sh. Aditi Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Vijay B. Vasanta, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 154Section 154(2)Section 23

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘D’, NEW DELHI Before Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member, Sh

JAN SHIKSHAN SANSATHAN,MOHALI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTIONS WARD, CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 801/CHANDI/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh25 Jun 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: The Appeal Is Finally Heard Or Disposed Off. 4. That The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals) Is Erroneous, Arbitrary, Opposed To Law & Facts Of The Case & Is, Thus, Untenable.”

For Appellant: Shri Tejmohan Singh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manpreet Duggal, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 11Section 143(1)Section 154Section 245

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,च"ीगढ़ "ायपीठ “ए” , च"ीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH “A”, CHANDIGARH HEARING

CANARA BANK, LARGE CORPORATE BRANCH,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3627/MUM/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Feb 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI (Accountant Member)

Section 144Section 194ASection 197Section 200ASection 201

with a view to rectify any mistake apparent from the record in accordance with the provisions of section 154(1). Moreover, as per section 154(2)(a) of the Act the AO can make such amendment on its own. Further, these mistakes are very much apparent from the record

KHUSHALRAO KESHAVRAO GARJE,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CPC,BANGLORE, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1866/MUM/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Sept 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Ms. Rucha VaidyaFor Respondent: Shri P.D. Chogule
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 154Section 250Section 254(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

154 of the Act, the AO has been conferred with power to rectify any mistake which is apparent from the record. As per section 154(2) of the Act, such rectification/amendment can be made by the AO on its Khushalrao Keshavrao Garje ITA no.1866/Mum./2022 own motion or pursuant

DY.CIT (E) -2(1) , MUMBAI vs. MUMBAI EDUCATIONAL TRUST, MUMBAI

ITA 1831/MUM/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Sept 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Jm

For Appellant: Sh. Rajesh DharapFor Respondent: Ms. Achal Sharma CIT DR
Section 10Section 10(33)Section 11Section 13Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, AM AND SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY, JM ITA

DY.CIT (E) -2(1) , MUMBAI vs. MUMBAI EDUCATIONAL TRUST, MUMBAI

ITA 1830/MUM/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Sept 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Jm

For Appellant: Sh. Rajesh DharapFor Respondent: Ms. Achal Sharma CIT DR
Section 10Section 10(33)Section 11Section 13Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, AM AND SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY, JM ITA

DY.CIT (E) -2(1) , MUMBAI vs. MUMBAI EDUCATIONAL TRUST, MUMBAI

ITA 1829/MUM/2022[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Sept 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Jm

For Appellant: Sh. Rajesh DharapFor Respondent: Ms. Achal Sharma CIT DR
Section 10Section 10(33)Section 11Section 13Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, AM AND SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY, JM ITA

DY.CIT (E) -2(1) , MUMBAI vs. MUMBAI EDUCATIONAL TRUST, MUMBAI

ITA 1828/MUM/2022[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Sept 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Jm

For Appellant: Sh. Rajesh DharapFor Respondent: Ms. Achal Sharma CIT DR
Section 10Section 10(33)Section 11Section 13Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, AM AND SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY, JM ITA

Section 154(2) — 8 judgments | BharatTax | BharatTax