← All Phrases

“Section 271(5)(1)(c)”

Section References (mined)Section 271Section 271(5)(1)(c)6 judgments

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-07, NEW DELHI vs. MOHD. SHAHNAWAZ, NEW DELHI

In the result, the Appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 9261/DEL/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Sept 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.I.T.A. No. 9051/Del/2019 (A.Y 2008-09) I.T.A. No. 9260/Del/2019 (A.Y 2010-11)

For Appellant: Ms. Monika Agarwal, Adv & Sh
Section 269Section 269SSection 269TSection 271Section 271DSection 271ESection 275Section 275(1)(c)

Central Range-5, New Delhi for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271E and 271D of the Act respectively. 9. The provisions of Section 271(5)(1)(c) provides for limitation to initiate penalty u/s 271D and 271E of the Act, which reads as under: “No order imposing a penalty under

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-07, NEW DELHI vs. MOHD. SHAHNAWAZ, NEW DELHI

In the result, the Appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 9260/DEL/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Sept 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.I.T.A. No. 9051/Del/2019 (A.Y 2008-09) I.T.A. No. 9260/Del/2019 (A.Y 2010-11)

For Appellant: Ms. Monika Agarwal, Adv & Sh
Section 269Section 269SSection 269TSection 271Section 271DSection 271ESection 275Section 275(1)(c)

Central Range-5, New Delhi for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271E and 271D of the Act respectively. 9. The provisions of Section 271(5)(1)(c) provides for limitation to initiate penalty u/s 271D and 271E of the Act, which reads as under: “No order imposing a penalty under

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI vs. MOHD. SHAHNAWAZ, NEW DELHI

In the result, the Appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 9054/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Sept 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.I.T.A. No. 9051/Del/2019 (A.Y 2008-09) I.T.A. No. 9260/Del/2019 (A.Y 2010-11)

For Appellant: Ms. Monika Agarwal, Adv & Sh
Section 269Section 269SSection 269TSection 271Section 271DSection 271ESection 275Section 275(1)(c)

Central Range-5, New Delhi for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271E and 271D of the Act respectively. 9. The provisions of Section 271(5)(1)(c) provides for limitation to initiate penalty u/s 271D and 271E of the Act, which reads as under: “No order imposing a penalty under

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI vs. MOHD. SHAHNAWAZ, NEW DELHI

In the result, the Appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 9053/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Sept 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.I.T.A. No. 9051/Del/2019 (A.Y 2008-09) I.T.A. No. 9260/Del/2019 (A.Y 2010-11)

For Appellant: Ms. Monika Agarwal, Adv & Sh
Section 269Section 269SSection 269TSection 271Section 271DSection 271ESection 275Section 275(1)(c)

Central Range-5, New Delhi for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271E and 271D of the Act respectively. 9. The provisions of Section 271(5)(1)(c) provides for limitation to initiate penalty u/s 271D and 271E of the Act, which reads as under: “No order imposing a penalty under

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI vs. MOHD. SHAHNAWAZ, NEW DELHI

In the result, the Appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 9052/DEL/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Sept 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.I.T.A. No. 9051/Del/2019 (A.Y 2008-09) I.T.A. No. 9260/Del/2019 (A.Y 2010-11)

For Appellant: Ms. Monika Agarwal, Adv & Sh
Section 269Section 269SSection 269TSection 271Section 271DSection 271ESection 275Section 275(1)(c)

Central Range-5, New Delhi for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271E and 271D of the Act respectively. 9. The provisions of Section 271(5)(1)(c) provides for limitation to initiate penalty u/s 271D and 271E of the Act, which reads as under: “No order imposing a penalty under

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI vs. MOHD. SHAHNAWAZ, NEW DELHI

In the result, the Appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 9051/DEL/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Sept 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Sh. Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.I.T.A. No. 9051/Del/2019 (A.Y 2008-09) I.T.A. No. 9260/Del/2019 (A.Y 2010-11)

For Appellant: Ms. Monika Agarwal, Adv & Sh
Section 269Section 269SSection 269TSection 271Section 271DSection 271ESection 275Section 275(1)(c)

Central Range-5, New Delhi for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271E and 271D of the Act respectively. 9. The provisions of Section 271(5)(1)(c) provides for limitation to initiate penalty u/s 271D and 271E of the Act, which reads as under: “No order imposing a penalty under