← All Phrases

“Section 71(3)(a)”

Section References (mined)Section 71Section 71(3)(a)1 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 71(3)(a) is Fakir Mohmed Haji Hasan v. CIT (247 ITR 290), cited in 136 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 71(3)(a)

Fakir Mohmed Haji Hasan v. CIT
247 ITR 290 · 2001 · High Court
136
citing judgments

Income deemed under sections 68, 69, 69A, 69B, or 69C of the Income-tax Act is a distinct category, separate from regular heads of income under Section 14, and losses from other heads, including business losses, cannot be set off against such deemed income.

CIT v. Shivakami Co. (P.) Ltd.
159 ITR 71 · 1986 · Supreme Court
133
citing judgments

The burden of proving an understatement of consideration or the receipt of 'on-money' lies solely with the Revenue, which must provide cogent evidence of actual receipt of higher consideration, beyond mere estimates or suspicion. Additions cannot be made based on assumptions like differences from circle rates without such evidence.

PCIT v. JSW Steels Ltd.
422 ITR 71 · 2020 · High Court
64
citing judgments

In search and seizure assessments under section 153A, if the assessment is unabated, the assessee cannot make fresh claims that were not made in the original return.

Mazagaon Dock Ltd. v. CIT & Excess Profits Tax
34 ITR 368 · 1958 · Supreme Court
57
citing judgments

Investments made by a holding company in its subsidiary can be considered a business activity, allowing related business expenditures to be deducted and not disallowed.

Para 71-75 ACIT v. Kences
308 ITR 230 · 2009 · High Court
47
citing judgments

Undisclosed income cannot be added based solely on seized documents or notings/jottings without corroborative or direct evidence that these materialized into transactions.

Baladin Ram v. CIT
71 ITR 427 · 1969 · Supreme Court
46
citing judgments

For an addition under Section 68, there must be a credit entry in the assessee's "books of accounts". A bank passbook is not considered the assessee's books of accounts for this purpose.

CIT v. Mythreyi Pai
152 ITR 247 · 1985 · High Court
44
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred towards the purchase of shares is a capital expenditure and therefore, interest expenditure incurred on such purchases is not eligible for deduction under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act.

CIT v. Upasana
225 ITR 845 · 1997 · High Court
41
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred by a holding company for making investments in a subsidiary can be treated as business expenditure and is not disallowable, as such investment activity can itself constitute a business.

Judgments citing Section 71(3)(a)

Section 71(3)(a) — 1 case laws | BharatTax