← All Phrases

“Section 154(6)”

Section References (mined)Section 154Section 154(6)5 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 154(6) is CIT v. Saravana Spinning Mills Ltd. (293 ITR 201), cited in 109 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 154(6)

CIT v. Saravana Spinning Mills Ltd.
293 ITR 201 · 2007 · Supreme Court
109
citing judgments

Expenditure for replacement of machinery parts qualifies as 'current repairs' under Section 31(i) of the Income-tax Act if it does not result in a new asset or substantially enhance the existing asset's life. For Section 31(i), the critical factor is whether the expense constitutes current repairs, making the general revenue vs. capital distinction less relevant for that specific section.

Capital Bus Service Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT
123 ITR 404 · 1980 · High Court
91
citing judgments

Depreciation under section 32 is allowable even if an asset is not actively used, provided it is kept in a condition of readiness or is put ready for use, as this amounts to passive user.

Union of India v. Tata Chemicals Ltd.
363 ITR 658 · 2014 · Supreme Court
91
citing judgments

The Department has a moral and legal obligation to refund excess tax collected from taxpayers, along with interest. An assessee is entitled to interest on the amount of taxes refunded, including interest on interest, as per Section 244A of the Income-tax Act.

CIT v. Delhi Press Patra Prakashan Ltd.
355 ITR 14 · 2013 · High Court
61
citing judgments

For Section 80IA and 80IB deductions, the profits of an eligible industrial undertaking or unit must be computed independently based on its actual profitability and market-rate inter-unit transactions, rather than applying a global profit margin of all the assessee's units.

Principal Commissioner of Income-tax v. Surya Impex
148 Taxmann.com 154 · 2023 · High Court
41
citing judgments

Where the Assessing Officer (AO) received information of bogus purchases involving accommodation entries, but the AO made additions at a higher rate than the rate applied to the parties providing such entries, the Tribunal was justified in limiting the addition to the assessee at a rate consistent with the additions made to the suppliers.

CIT v. Kwality Biscuits Ltd.
284 ITR 434 · 2006 · Supreme Court
32
citing judgments

Interest under sections 234B and 234C is not attracted in cases where income is assessed under Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) provisions under section 115JB.

Mather & Platt (India) Ltd. v. CIT
168 ITR 493 · 1987 · High Court
30
citing judgments

Deduction for commission payments cannot be disallowed solely because summons served on commission agents were returned unserved, especially if the agents may have moved addresses years after the transactions.

BDA Ltd. v. ITO (TDS)
281 ITR 99 · 2006 · High Court
25
citing judgments

An assessee cannot be held as an assessee-in-default under section 201(1) of the Income-tax Act if the agreements entered into were not works contracts within the meaning of section 194C.

Judgments citing Section 154(6)