← All Phrases

“Section 154(6)”

Section References (mined)Section 154Section 154(6)5 judgments

ICRA LIMITED,DELHI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-10(1), CR BUILDING, IP ESTATE, DELHI

In the result, A.Y.2013-14 of Revenue’s appeal is dismissed and Assessee’s appeals for A

ITA 2723/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jan 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad & Shri M. Balaganesh

Section 14ASection 37(1)

computation sheet (i.e., ITNS) and notice of demand u/s 156 of the Act which is a jurisdictional pre-requisite in terms of Section 154(6) of the Act. 6. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the NFAC has erred in determining the assessed income

ICRA LIMITED,DELHI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-10(1), CR BUILDING, IP ESTATE, DELHI

In the result, A.Y.2013-14 of Revenue’s appeal is dismissed and Assessee’s appeals for A

ITA 2722/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad & Shri M. Balaganesh

Section 14ASection 37(1)

computation sheet (i.e., ITNS) and notice of demand u/s 156 of the Act which is a jurisdictional pre-requisite in terms of Section 154(6) of the Act. 6. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the NFAC has erred in determining the assessed income

ICRA LIMITED,DELHI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-10(1), CR BUILDING, IP ESTATE, DELHI

In the result, A.Y.2013-14 of Revenue’s appeal is dismissed and Assessee’s appeals for A

ITA 2721/DEL/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad & Shri M. Balaganesh

Section 14ASection 37(1)

computation sheet (i.e., ITNS) and notice of demand u/s 156 of the Act which is a jurisdictional pre-requisite in terms of Section 154(6) of the Act. 6. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the NFAC has erred in determining the assessed income

ICRA LIMITED,DELHI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-10(1), CR BUILDING, IP ESTATE, DELHI

In the result, A.Y.2013-14 of Revenue’s appeal is dismissed and Assessee’s appeals for A

ITA 2720/DEL/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jan 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad & Shri M. Balaganesh

Section 14ASection 37(1)

computation sheet (i.e., ITNS) and notice of demand u/s 156 of the Act which is a jurisdictional pre-requisite in terms of Section 154(6) of the Act. 6. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the NFAC has erred in determining the assessed income

DIGAMBER JAIN SWADHYAY MANDIR TRUST,BHAVNAGAR vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-1 (EXEMP.), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 476/AHD/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Oct 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Ld. Nfac. Assessee Was Of The Wrong Impression, Separate Appeal Is Not Required To Be Filed Against The Appellate Order Passed Against Rectification Order, But The Same Was Clarified By The Chartered Accountant. It Is Thereafter The Assessee Filed The Above Appeal With A Delay Of 82 Days Which Is Neither Wilful Nor Wanton & Therefore Requested To Condone The Delay.

Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 154Section 154(6)Section 292B

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD “B” BENCH Before: Smt. Annapurna Gupta, Accountant Member And Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar