“Section 143(2)(i)”

Section References (mined)Section 143Section 143(2)(i)4 judgments

MARSHAL SECURITY SERVICES,AGRA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AGRA

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 131/AGR/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Agra28 Oct 2025AY 2016-17

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 250

{ "clean_text": "IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,\nAGRA BENCH, AGRA\nBEFORE : SHRI M. BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\nAND\nSHRI SUNIL

SUCHITA BHATIA,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CIR-6, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 902/JPR/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur17 Mar 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vivek Bhargav, C.AFor Respondent: Shri. Anup Singh, Addl.CIT a

Section 143(2)Section 250

under consideration on 17.10.2016 declaring total income of Rs. 15,54,620/-. The case was selected under Limited Scrutiny through CASS. Notice under section 143(2) was issued on 17.07.2017, which was duly served upon the assessee. In response to the statutory notices issued during the proceedings, the assessee filed ... onwards) M/s. Nitin Killawala & Associates - Mumbai ITAT (ITA No. 1611/Mum/2013) • The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS and notice under section 143(2) was issued to the assessee. • The assessee was required to furnish the details/reconciliation of the items mentioned in the AIR information. • The AO, however, widened

SOURABH SHARMA,JAIPUR vs. PCIT,JAIPUR-2, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 240/JPR/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur22 Nov 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Mahendra Gargieya (Adv.)For Respondent: Sh. Arvind Kumar (CIT) a

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 263

आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR Mk0 ,l- lhrky{eh

SHRI DIPTEN AHINDRA BHOWMICK,GANDHIDHAM-KUTCH vs. THE ITO, WARD-1, GANDHIDHAM-KUTCH

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 134/RJT/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot04 Jan 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri T. R. Senthil Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Gaurang Khakhar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Shramdeep Sinha, CIT DR

Section 10Section 143(3)Section 154Section 250Section 264Section 264(1)Section 40A(3)

Scrutiny'. The assessees concerned have duly been intimated about their cases falling either in 'Limited Scrutiny' or 'Complete Scrutiny' through notices issued under section 143(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('Act'). The procedure for handling 'Limited Scrutiny' cases shall be as under: a. In 'Limited Scrutiny' cases ... made addition on account of cash payment in violation of section 40A(3) of the Act whereas on perusal of notice under section 143(2) of the Act, we note that the notice for “Limited Scrutiny” was issued for examination of “cash in hand”. There was no mentioning/whisper about examination