“Section 156(1)”

Section References (mined)Section 156Section 156(1)3 judgments

SUBHASH PARETA,KOTA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, KOTA, KOTA

ITA 394/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur19 May 2025AY 2015-16

Section 142Section 143(3)Section 250Section 40ASection 69Section 69C

PER GAGAN GOYAL, A.M: These two appeals by the assessee are directed against the order of CIT(A), Jaipur -04

SUBHASH PARETA,KOTA RAJASTHAN vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2, KOTA, KOTA RAJASHTAN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 114/JPR/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur19 May 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Gagan Goyal & Shri Narinder Kumarsubhash Pareta, 3/148, Basant Vihar, Dada Bari, Ganesh Talab, Kota - 324009 Pan No. Aggpp4046H ...... Appellant Vs.

For Appellant: Mr.P.C. PARWAL, CA, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Mrs. ANITA RINESH, Addl. CIT, Ld. Sr. DR

Section 142Section 250Section 40ASection 69Section 69C

information report and other materials, if any, accompanying the FIR do not disclose a cognizable offence, justifying an investigation by police officers under section 156(1) of the Code except under an order of a Magistrate within the purview of section 155(2) of the Code. (3) Where the uncontroverted

MOHD SARWAR,RAGHAVENDRA NAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, KARIMNAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 238/HYD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad02 Apr 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2018-19 Mohd. Sarwar, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 2-8-306/12, Raghavendra Ward – 2, Nagar, Waddepalle, Karimnagar. Hanamkonda, Warangal, Telangana - 506370. Pan : Aoups2364F. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri A. Vamseedhar, C.A. Revenue By: Shri Mookambikeyan, Sr.Ar Date Of Hearing: 02.04.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 02.04.2024

For Appellant: Shri A. Vamseedhar, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Mookambikeyan, Sr.AR

Section 142(1)Section 156Section 156(1)Section 250Section 270A

which is prior to the passing of penalty order u/s.270A of the Act, dated:22.01.2022, which is in contravention to the provisions of section 156(1) of the Act and hence the notice of demand u/s.156 is null and void, hence the same needs to be quashed and which