“Section 156(1)”

Section References (mined)Section 156Section 156(1)3 judgments

SUBHASH PARETA,KOTA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, KOTA, KOTA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 394/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur19 May 2025AY 2015-16

Section 142Section 143(3)Section 250Section 40ASection 69Section 69C

information report and other materials, if any,\naccompanying the FIR do not disclose a cognizable offence, justifying an investigation\nby police officers under section 156(1) of the Code except under an order of a\nMagistrate within the purview of section 155(2) of the Code.\n(3)\nWhere

SUBHASH PARETA,KOTA RAJASTHAN vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2, KOTA, KOTA RAJASHTAN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 114/JPR/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur19 May 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Gagan Goyal & Shri Narinder Kumarsubhash Pareta, 3/148, Basant Vihar, Dada Bari, Ganesh Talab, Kota - 324009 Pan No. Aggpp4046H ...... Appellant Vs.

For Appellant: Mr.P.C. PARWAL, CA, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Mrs. ANITA RINESH, Addl. CIT, Ld. Sr. DR

Section 142Section 250Section 40ASection 69Section 69C

information report and other materials, if any, accompanying the FIR do not disclose a cognizable offence, justifying an investigation by police officers under section 156(1) of the Code except under an order of a Magistrate within the purview of section 155(2) of the Code. (3) Where the uncontroverted

MOHD SARWAR,RAGHAVENDRA NAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, KARIMNAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 238/HYD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad02 Apr 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2018-19 Mohd. Sarwar, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 2-8-306/12, Raghavendra Ward – 2, Nagar, Waddepalle, Karimnagar. Hanamkonda, Warangal, Telangana - 506370. Pan : Aoups2364F. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri A. Vamseedhar, C.A. Revenue By: Shri Mookambikeyan, Sr.Ar Date Of Hearing: 02.04.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 02.04.2024

For Appellant: Shri A. Vamseedhar, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Mookambikeyan, Sr.AR

Section 142(1)Section 156Section 156(1)Section 250Section 270A

which is prior to the passing of penalty order u/s.270A of the Act, dated:22.01.2022, which is in contravention to the provisions of section 156(1) of the Act and hence the notice of demand u/s.156 is null and void, hence the same needs to be quashed and which